Liberal "christians" and various homosexualists label the American Family Association as an “extremist hate group” fearing that such national Christian organizations will inform voters how to oust three Iowa Supreme Court justices who shoved same-sex "marriage" down Iowans' throats last year.
Also opposing the justices is an Iowa pastor who, like many others, is challenging the IRS to try to muzzle him.
UPDATE 11/3/10: Iowans Oust Gay Agenda Activist Justices
UPDATE 10/24/10: Voters split on expelling justices
-- From "Religious leaders urge Vander Plaats to denounce American Family Association" by Molly Rossiter, reporter for the Cedar Rapids Globe Gazette 10/13/10
Calling it an “extremist hate group” trying to manipulate votes by using fear, [pro-homosexual] religious leaders across the state Wednesday asked Bob Vander Plaats and his group, Iowa For Freedom, to denounce the American Family Association.
American Family Association, based in Tupelo, Miss., touts itself as “one of the largest and most effective pro-family organizations in the country” with a mission of motivating and equipping people to “restore American culture to its moral foundations.”
It is a major financial supporter of Vander Plaats’ Iowa For Freedom organization. The two organizations are leading a campaign to oust three Iowa Supreme Court justices because of the high court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Group Says Extremists Funding Attack On Iowa Courts" posted at KCCI TV8 Des Moines, IA 10/13/10
The [liberal] Interfaith Alliance said it's not trying to tell Iowans how to vote, but said voters should know the group behind the effort is the American Family Association. The Alliance calls them an out-of-state extremist group with a hate-filled agenda.
The group met on the same steps where Bob Vander Plaats launched the effort months ago to remove three justices from their seats. Vander Plaats calls on supporters to vote against Chief Justice Marsha Ternus, David Baker and Michael Streit, all up for retention vote on Nov 2.
The AFA paid for an advertising campaign and according to public records, has covered nearly $70,000 in expenses for Vander Plaats' group, Iowa for Freedom.
David Lane, a spokesman for AFA Action Inc., said the group has every right to get involved in a campaign in Iowa.
About $320,000 has been spent on the campaign to oust the judges. The National Organization for Marriage has spent $235,000 on TV ads.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Iowa pastor preaches politics to oust 3 justices who backed gay marriage" posted at USA Today 10/13/10
The Rev. Cary K. Gordon . . . an associate pastor at Cornerstone World Outreach in Sioux City, says he will defy federal law this month when he urges the congregation to vote to not retain the three justices, who participated in a unanimous ruling that allowed same-sex couples to wed. His mass mailing to 1,000 church leaders in September prompted one national religious liberty group to file a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service.
Advocates of the separation of church and state and some religious leaders say Gordon's plan is illegal, immoral and an attempt to falsely frame his dispute as a freedom-of-speech violation. The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State in Washington, D.C., called Gordon's actions one of the most outrageous attempts to politicize a church that he has ever seen.
Others, such as Jeff Mullen, senior pastor of Point of Grace Church in Waukee, are urging Iowa pastors to communicate to their congregations the "biblical mandate for involvement in local and national elections."
An IRS spokesman declined to comment.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
County Forbids Biblical Signage, Not Political
A South Carolina man says his constitutional rights have been violated after he was told by his local government to remove the Bible-themed signs he had posted on his property.
-- From "South Carolina Man Fights to Keep Religious Signs on His Property" By Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/8/10
Oscar Moultrie says a Berkeley County, S.C., ordinance that requires residents to obtain government permission before putting up signs on their private property -- other than "for sale," "for rent," political signs, and a few other exceptions -- violates his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
Moultrie says he received no complaints about his signs before the county ordered him in March to remove them or pay $25 to get a permit to post them.
In his lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston, S.C., he is asking the court to issue an immediate injunction that bars enforcement of the ordinance and declares it unconstitutional.
"The thing with the ordinance," says John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, which is representing Moultrie, "is it allows for political signs, which means that in this particular case it would be what you call viewpoint discrimination, which the Supreme Court and a number of federal courts have ruled on.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "South Carolina Man Fights to Keep Religious Signs on His Property" By Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/8/10
Oscar Moultrie says a Berkeley County, S.C., ordinance that requires residents to obtain government permission before putting up signs on their private property -- other than "for sale," "for rent," political signs, and a few other exceptions -- violates his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
Moultrie says he received no complaints about his signs before the county ordered him in March to remove them or pay $25 to get a permit to post them.
In his lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston, S.C., he is asking the court to issue an immediate injunction that bars enforcement of the ordinance and declares it unconstitutional.
"The thing with the ordinance," says John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, which is representing Moultrie, "is it allows for political signs, which means that in this particular case it would be what you call viewpoint discrimination, which the Supreme Court and a number of federal courts have ruled on.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
anti-Christian,
Bible,
Constitution,
freedom of religion,
freedom of speech,
SC
IL Gov. Pushes for Same-sex 'Marriage'
Drawing contrast with his GOP rival, gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn predicts that he'll sign homosexual civil unions legislation in the coming weeks, and says he won't stand in the way of "gay marriage."
Illinois residents, click here to E-mail Gov. Quinn and legislators to stop the Gay Agenda.
UPDATE 11/30/10: Homosexual bills on the floor today!
UPDATE 11/10/10: Chicago Sun-Times reports enough votes to pass bill impending
-- From "Quinn: Ill. could legalize civil unions this year" by The Associated Press, posted at Chicago Tribune 10/6/10
Gov. Pat Quinn says he believes civil unions could be legalized in Illinois before the end of the year.
During an interview with the (Arlington Heights) Daily Herald, Quinn said he believes the measure has enough votes to pass during the legislature's fall veto session.
Quinn calls himself a strong advocate of civil unions and says it comes down to a "need to encourage tolerance" in Illinois.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois Governor Pat Quinn: Civil Unions Could Happen This Year" posted at Huffington Post 10/7/10
"The votes are there, I believe," Quinn said. "In the Senate for sure, and definitely I think we can do it in the House."
The measure legalizing civil unions was sponsored this year by Rep. Greg Harris, a Democratic state legislator from Chicago.
Every year, Harris sponsors two bills in the House: one legalizing civil unions, and the other for gay marriage. While he is a proponent of marriage rights, he's also a pragmatic vote-counter; Harris believes that more legislators will support the civil unions bill, though he's not certain that he has the 60 votes required for passage.
Still, there may be some urgency to the matter. Quinn's rival for governor, Republican State Senator Bill Brady, is staunchly opposed to any form of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Earlier this year, he introduced a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and civil unions.
If Quinn were to lose in November, the December veto session might be the last shot for some time at advancing gay rights in the state.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Illinois residents, click here to E-mail Gov. Quinn and legislators to stop the Gay Agenda.
UPDATE 11/30/10: Homosexual bills on the floor today!
UPDATE 11/10/10: Chicago Sun-Times reports enough votes to pass bill impending
-- From "Quinn: Ill. could legalize civil unions this year" by The Associated Press, posted at Chicago Tribune 10/6/10
Gov. Pat Quinn says he believes civil unions could be legalized in Illinois before the end of the year.
During an interview with the (Arlington Heights) Daily Herald, Quinn said he believes the measure has enough votes to pass during the legislature's fall veto session.
Quinn calls himself a strong advocate of civil unions and says it comes down to a "need to encourage tolerance" in Illinois.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois Governor Pat Quinn: Civil Unions Could Happen This Year" posted at Huffington Post 10/7/10
"The votes are there, I believe," Quinn said. "In the Senate for sure, and definitely I think we can do it in the House."
The measure legalizing civil unions was sponsored this year by Rep. Greg Harris, a Democratic state legislator from Chicago.
Every year, Harris sponsors two bills in the House: one legalizing civil unions, and the other for gay marriage. While he is a proponent of marriage rights, he's also a pragmatic vote-counter; Harris believes that more legislators will support the civil unions bill, though he's not certain that he has the 60 votes required for passage.
Still, there may be some urgency to the matter. Quinn's rival for governor, Republican State Senator Bill Brady, is staunchly opposed to any form of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Earlier this year, he introduced a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and civil unions.
If Quinn were to lose in November, the December veto session might be the last shot for some time at advancing gay rights in the state.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
civil unions,
election,
gay agenda,
homosexuality,
IL,
same-sex marriage,
vote
Monday, October 11, 2010
God Saves 3,000 Babies: Prayer Vigil
The national 40 Days for Life prayer campaign reached a historic milestone today as it can now confirm 3,000 babies have been saved from abortions as a result of the prayer and abortion alternatives efforts of pro-life advocates at abortion centers across the nation.
"Three thousand -- to God be the glory for reaching this major milestone."
-- From "40 Days for Life Prayer Campaign Reaches 3,000 Babies Saved From Abortion" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/11/10
. . . a story from Carol, a pro-life advocate in Houston, where two unborn children were spared from abortion.
A group prayed while one volunteer, holding a sign reading "Pray to end abortion," waved at cars driving by. After a while, a van turned into the Planned Parenthood parking lot. They drove around slowly then headed towards the exit . . . As they reached the street, the van stopped and a woman rolled down the window.
"Because you were here," she said, "my daughter has chosen not to have an abortion. Thanks for being here and saving her baby."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Victim of abortion credits God for her survival" by Charlotte Graham, The Leader Call (Laurel, MS) 10/9/10
Gianna Jessen is passionate about life and wants the world to know it.
“I was born in an abortion clinic which is pretty rare,” Jessen joked. “It was April 6, 1977. My biological parents were 17. My birth mom was in her seven-and-a-half month of pregnancy when she went to the abortion clinic.”
Jessen explained that her mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. She added that this was legal in Southern California where she was born. Jessen miraculously survived being “burned alive” for approximately 18 hours in the saline solution while in her mother’s womb.
“I should be blind… dead,” explained Jessen. “My story is not my identity. My identity is Christ.”
Jessen explained that she survived because of God’s handiwork. She was born in the early morning hours when the abortion doctor was not around. Jessen said that when the nurse on duty discovered she was alive, she called for an ambulance and had Jessen transported to a local hospital.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
"Three thousand -- to God be the glory for reaching this major milestone."
-- From "40 Days for Life Prayer Campaign Reaches 3,000 Babies Saved From Abortion" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/11/10
. . . a story from Carol, a pro-life advocate in Houston, where two unborn children were spared from abortion.
A group prayed while one volunteer, holding a sign reading "Pray to end abortion," waved at cars driving by. After a while, a van turned into the Planned Parenthood parking lot. They drove around slowly then headed towards the exit . . . As they reached the street, the van stopped and a woman rolled down the window.
"Because you were here," she said, "my daughter has chosen not to have an abortion. Thanks for being here and saving her baby."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Victim of abortion credits God for her survival" by Charlotte Graham, The Leader Call (Laurel, MS) 10/9/10
Gianna Jessen is passionate about life and wants the world to know it.
“I was born in an abortion clinic which is pretty rare,” Jessen joked. “It was April 6, 1977. My biological parents were 17. My birth mom was in her seven-and-a-half month of pregnancy when she went to the abortion clinic.”
Jessen explained that her mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. She added that this was legal in Southern California where she was born. Jessen miraculously survived being “burned alive” for approximately 18 hours in the saline solution while in her mother’s womb.
“I should be blind… dead,” explained Jessen. “My story is not my identity. My identity is Christ.”
Jessen explained that she survived because of God’s handiwork. She was born in the early morning hours when the abortion doctor was not around. Jessen said that when the nurse on duty discovered she was alive, she called for an ambulance and had Jessen transported to a local hospital.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Muslim Holiday Celebrated at Mass. Schools
Public schools in Cambridge, Massachusetts will be the first in the state to close every year in honor of Eid al-Fitr or Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice).
. . . the city’s Muslim population appears to be growing.
"As their kids come home and say, ‘Oh, look, we now have a holiday,’ the parents might begin to feel safer here."
UPDATE 11/7/11: Muslim holiday celebrated for second year in a row
-- From "Cambridge school district to observe Muslim holiday" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
Cambridge School Committee member Marc McGovern, who pushed for the policy, says people should avoid what he calls hysteria and the stereotype of Muslims as terrorists. He says Cambridge schools close for some Christian and Jewish holidays and Muslims should be treated the same.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "School system to get Muslim holiday" by Brock Parker, Boston Globe Correspondent 10/10/10
The school district’s decision, announced last month, was made as the national discussion about Islam continues, fueled by a Mosque proposal two blocks from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Florida preacher Terry Jones’s threat to burn a Koran. The discussion has also touched local schools, as Wellesley school officials drew criticism recently for a video that showed sixth-grade students kneeling during a prayer service at a Boston mosque during a field trip in May.
Cambridge School Superintendent Jeffrey Young said the district does not collect information about the religion of its students. But Young said that there is a significant Muslim population in the city, and that, at least anecdotally, the Muslim population in the schools appears to be growing.
A large Muslim population is one of the reasons why the school district in Dearborn, Mich., began closing schools for high Islamic holy days 10 years ago, said David Mustonen, communications coordinator for the school system.
In September, public schools in Burlington, Vt., also closed on Eid al-Fitr for the first time, said Dan Balon, director of the school district’s diversity and equity office.
Balon said there is an increasing Muslim population in the schools, and the district decided to close on the holiday rather than risk low attendance rates and force students to decide between school and staying home to celebrate the holiday.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Note: Muslims represent less than two percent of the U.S. population, and is growing.
. . . the city’s Muslim population appears to be growing.
"As their kids come home and say, ‘Oh, look, we now have a holiday,’ the parents might begin to feel safer here."
UPDATE 11/7/11: Muslim holiday celebrated for second year in a row
-- From "Cambridge school district to observe Muslim holiday" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
Cambridge School Committee member Marc McGovern, who pushed for the policy, says people should avoid what he calls hysteria and the stereotype of Muslims as terrorists. He says Cambridge schools close for some Christian and Jewish holidays and Muslims should be treated the same.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "School system to get Muslim holiday" by Brock Parker, Boston Globe Correspondent 10/10/10
The school district’s decision, announced last month, was made as the national discussion about Islam continues, fueled by a Mosque proposal two blocks from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Florida preacher Terry Jones’s threat to burn a Koran. The discussion has also touched local schools, as Wellesley school officials drew criticism recently for a video that showed sixth-grade students kneeling during a prayer service at a Boston mosque during a field trip in May.
Cambridge School Superintendent Jeffrey Young said the district does not collect information about the religion of its students. But Young said that there is a significant Muslim population in the city, and that, at least anecdotally, the Muslim population in the schools appears to be growing.
A large Muslim population is one of the reasons why the school district in Dearborn, Mich., began closing schools for high Islamic holy days 10 years ago, said David Mustonen, communications coordinator for the school system.
In September, public schools in Burlington, Vt., also closed on Eid al-Fitr for the first time, said Dan Balon, director of the school district’s diversity and equity office.
Balon said there is an increasing Muslim population in the schools, and the district decided to close on the holiday rather than risk low attendance rates and force students to decide between school and staying home to celebrate the holiday.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Note: Muslims represent less than two percent of the U.S. population, and is growing.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Pro-family/Pro-life Candidates Likely Winners
While Culture War issues are downplayed this election year, abortionists and homosexualists are facing a sea change political landscape across America. Example: The pro-abortion/pro-homosexual Iowa Gov. Culver is trailing by double digits in all polls.
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Teavangelical Party' Emerges from 2010 Election Polling
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Life' Wins 2010 Election
UPDATE 10/18/10: Republicans Will Take House From Pro-Abortion Democrats in Election
RELATED 10/8/10: Iowa Gov. candidate Brandstad opposed abortion via 'telemedicine'
Refer to On-line Abortions by Planned Parenthood Going Nationwide
-- From "From abortion to stem cells, Chet Culver and Terry Branstad differ sharply" by Jason Clayworth, The Des Moines Register 10/10/10
Republican Terry Branstad wants to require any woman seeking an abortion in Iowa to first undergo an ultrasound and view its depiction of the fetus.
In addition to abortion, some of the biggest differences between Culver and Branstad include:
• Marriage rights for same-sex couples. Culver favors; Branstad opposes.
• Stem-cell research. Culver favors embryonic stem-cell research; Branstad wants to reinstate a ban on that type of research.
A Catholic, Branstad was particularly active in his previous four terms in working to limit abortion. His administration fought a years-long battle to block the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Quad Cities. (A federal court ruled against him.) He also signed laws requiring notification of parents before a minor child could have an abortion and banning certain late-term abortions.
Culver, a member of a Presbyterian church, signed a bill repealing the 2002 ban on creating embryonic stem cells through a method known as therapeutic cloning. He believes such research can lead to lifesaving medical breakthroughs and expand the bioscience industry in Iowa.
Disagreement over the best tactic to fight same-sex marriage was a defining difference in the Republican primary for governor. This fall, focus on this issue has shifted from the governor's race to a high-profile campaign to oust three justices who participated in the unanimous April 2009 ruling that allowed same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above (which is extensive and detailed), CLICK HERE.
From "Polls From Last Week Show Pro-Life Candidates Winning or in Close Races" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/10/10
. . . some political observers are saying the odds of pro-life advocates recapturing the House and Senate from abortion proponents is now 50-50.
In the Washington Senate race, pro-life Republican challenger Dino Rossi has edged slightly ahead of pro-abortion incumbent Democrat Patty Murray.
Next, Republican Nathan Deal now holds a nine-point lead over Democrat Roy Barnes in the race to be Georgia’s next governor.
In Texas, pro-life Republican Governor Rick Perry has now moved past 50% support against pro-abortion Democratic challenger Bill White in his bid for reelection in Texas.
Looking at the Florida Senate race, coming off a contentious televised debate, pro-life Republican Marco Rubio has now jumped to a two-to-one lead over pro-abortion independent candidate Charlie Crist. Democratic Congressman Kendrick Meek still runs third.
In the Nevada gubernatorial race, Republican Brian Sandoval still holds a 13-point lead over Democrat Rory Reid . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Emily's List leader spurs women to halt GOP" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
A Democratic women's [pro-abortion] group is warning voters that a Republican takeover of Congress would mean "a dangerous world."
Emily's List, which aims to elect women who support abortion rights, also launched a website, boehnersamerica.org, with its view of the Republican agenda.
The group also plans an online advertising campaign around Mr. Boehner, similar to their drive against Sarah Palin, the GOP's 2008 vice-presidential nominee.
Two conservative groups opposed to abortion and gay marriage are teaming up in an effort to get more Latinos to vote for Republican [U.S. Senate Calif. candidate] Carly Fiorina.
The ad says that [Calif.] Sen. Barbara Boxer supports "abortion and homosexual marriage" and "doesn't share our values."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
See also, 'Pro-life Feminist' Candidates Storm Congress
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Teavangelical Party' Emerges from 2010 Election Polling
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Life' Wins 2010 Election
UPDATE 10/18/10: Republicans Will Take House From Pro-Abortion Democrats in Election
RELATED 10/8/10: Iowa Gov. candidate Brandstad opposed abortion via 'telemedicine'
Refer to On-line Abortions by Planned Parenthood Going Nationwide
-- From "From abortion to stem cells, Chet Culver and Terry Branstad differ sharply" by Jason Clayworth, The Des Moines Register 10/10/10
Republican Terry Branstad wants to require any woman seeking an abortion in Iowa to first undergo an ultrasound and view its depiction of the fetus.
In addition to abortion, some of the biggest differences between Culver and Branstad include:
• Marriage rights for same-sex couples. Culver favors; Branstad opposes.
• Stem-cell research. Culver favors embryonic stem-cell research; Branstad wants to reinstate a ban on that type of research.
A Catholic, Branstad was particularly active in his previous four terms in working to limit abortion. His administration fought a years-long battle to block the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Quad Cities. (A federal court ruled against him.) He also signed laws requiring notification of parents before a minor child could have an abortion and banning certain late-term abortions.
Culver, a member of a Presbyterian church, signed a bill repealing the 2002 ban on creating embryonic stem cells through a method known as therapeutic cloning. He believes such research can lead to lifesaving medical breakthroughs and expand the bioscience industry in Iowa.
Disagreement over the best tactic to fight same-sex marriage was a defining difference in the Republican primary for governor. This fall, focus on this issue has shifted from the governor's race to a high-profile campaign to oust three justices who participated in the unanimous April 2009 ruling that allowed same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above (which is extensive and detailed), CLICK HERE.
From "Polls From Last Week Show Pro-Life Candidates Winning or in Close Races" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/10/10
. . . some political observers are saying the odds of pro-life advocates recapturing the House and Senate from abortion proponents is now 50-50.
In the Washington Senate race, pro-life Republican challenger Dino Rossi has edged slightly ahead of pro-abortion incumbent Democrat Patty Murray.
Next, Republican Nathan Deal now holds a nine-point lead over Democrat Roy Barnes in the race to be Georgia’s next governor.
In Texas, pro-life Republican Governor Rick Perry has now moved past 50% support against pro-abortion Democratic challenger Bill White in his bid for reelection in Texas.
Looking at the Florida Senate race, coming off a contentious televised debate, pro-life Republican Marco Rubio has now jumped to a two-to-one lead over pro-abortion independent candidate Charlie Crist. Democratic Congressman Kendrick Meek still runs third.
In the Nevada gubernatorial race, Republican Brian Sandoval still holds a 13-point lead over Democrat Rory Reid . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Emily's List leader spurs women to halt GOP" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
A Democratic women's [pro-abortion] group is warning voters that a Republican takeover of Congress would mean "a dangerous world."
Emily's List, which aims to elect women who support abortion rights, also launched a website, boehnersamerica.org, with its view of the Republican agenda.
The group also plans an online advertising campaign around Mr. Boehner, similar to their drive against Sarah Palin, the GOP's 2008 vice-presidential nominee.
Two conservative groups opposed to abortion and gay marriage are teaming up in an effort to get more Latinos to vote for Republican [U.S. Senate Calif. candidate] Carly Fiorina.
The ad says that [Calif.] Sen. Barbara Boxer supports "abortion and homosexual marriage" and "doesn't share our values."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
See also, 'Pro-life Feminist' Candidates Storm Congress
Labels:
abortion,
apostasy,
CA,
culture war,
Democrat,
election,
FL,
GA,
gay agenda,
homosexuality,
Iowa,
judicial activism,
Nevada,
poll,
Republicans,
same-sex marriage,
stem cell research,
TX,
vote
MN Archbishop Riles Liberals with Doctrine
Secularists and homosexualists join with liberal 'catholics' in protest of Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt preaching the Truth beyond the Church walls; the archdiocese mailed hundreds of thousands of DVDs in support of marriage (one man and one woman) as designed by God.
-- From "Minn. DVD against same-sex marriage sparks protest" by The Associated Press 10/9/10
Deb Bittner says she's a lifelong Catholic. But she thinks Archbishop John Nienstedt's (NYN'-stedz) DVD sent a message of exclusion.
The 53-year-old Bittner says Catholicism is supposed to be about compassion. She says she organized the protest after a lesbian co-worker received the DVD and asked Bittner what she as a Catholic would do about it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Catholics get creative in response to archbishop's anti-gay-marriage message" by Molly Guthrey, Twin Cities Pioneer Press 10/10/10
The materials, sent to Catholic households throughout Minnesota, include an introductory letter from each local bishop and the DVD, which features Nienstedt reviewing the Catholic teaching on marriage and his concerns about potential legislation that would alter the institution.
"Reactions, as you might guess, are across the board," said Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. "Some are extremely supportive, and some are not extremely supportive."
CLICK HERE to read the lengthy article chronicling how some people are protesting the Archbishop's DVD.
From "Minnesota Archbishop denies gay activists Holy Communion" by Richard Sikorski, Orange County Roman Catholic Examiner 10/8/10
An estimated 25 gay activists wearing protest buttons and sashes were denied Communion by Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt during his first student Mass at St. John's Abbey. When the protesters extended their hands to receive Our Lord's Body and Blood, Archbishop Nienstedt extended his hand in blessing instead.
The Archdiocese wanted to make it clear that the Archbishop was not refusing Holy Communion to homosexuals, only refusing to allow the Holy Eucharist as venue for protest. Archdiocese spoke person Dennis McGrath has repeatedly told gay activist groups, "You cannot receive communion if you wear the rainbow sash, because it's a political statement, a sign of protest. Going to the communion rail is the most sacred part of our faith, the eucharist. We don't allow anybody to make political statements or any kind of protest."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Minn. DVD against same-sex marriage sparks protest" by The Associated Press 10/9/10
Deb Bittner says she's a lifelong Catholic. But she thinks Archbishop John Nienstedt's (NYN'-stedz) DVD sent a message of exclusion.
The 53-year-old Bittner says Catholicism is supposed to be about compassion. She says she organized the protest after a lesbian co-worker received the DVD and asked Bittner what she as a Catholic would do about it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Catholics get creative in response to archbishop's anti-gay-marriage message" by Molly Guthrey, Twin Cities Pioneer Press 10/10/10
The materials, sent to Catholic households throughout Minnesota, include an introductory letter from each local bishop and the DVD, which features Nienstedt reviewing the Catholic teaching on marriage and his concerns about potential legislation that would alter the institution.
"Reactions, as you might guess, are across the board," said Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. "Some are extremely supportive, and some are not extremely supportive."
CLICK HERE to read the lengthy article chronicling how some people are protesting the Archbishop's DVD.
From "Minnesota Archbishop denies gay activists Holy Communion" by Richard Sikorski, Orange County Roman Catholic Examiner 10/8/10
An estimated 25 gay activists wearing protest buttons and sashes were denied Communion by Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt during his first student Mass at St. John's Abbey. When the protesters extended their hands to receive Our Lord's Body and Blood, Archbishop Nienstedt extended his hand in blessing instead.
The Archdiocese wanted to make it clear that the Archbishop was not refusing Holy Communion to homosexuals, only refusing to allow the Holy Eucharist as venue for protest. Archdiocese spoke person Dennis McGrath has repeatedly told gay activist groups, "You cannot receive communion if you wear the rainbow sash, because it's a political statement, a sign of protest. Going to the communion rail is the most sacred part of our faith, the eucharist. We don't allow anybody to make political statements or any kind of protest."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
catholic,
gay agenda,
homosexual activists,
homosexuality,
MN,
same-sex marriage
Saturday, October 09, 2010
"Right-wingers'" Newborn Taken by NH Officials
An Epsom [New Hampshire] couple says state social workers seized their newborn baby hours after her birth because of the father's affiliation with an organization that opposes government tyranny.
UPDATE 10/14/10: State returns baby to parents, without explanation
The parents may have had a difficult past, but the issue is that the State documents included the father's political affiliation as harmful to children.
-- From "State takes infant, spurs protest" by Shawne K. Wickham, New Hampshire Sunday News Staff 10/9/10
A baby girl [Cheyenne Irish] was taken into state custody at Concord Hospital by child welfare officials [DCYF] on Thursday, just hours after she was born, according to her parents. And now the parents are at the center of an Internet-fueled fire storm over government intervention and parental rights.
In an affidavit supporting its actions, the DCYF . . . notes [the baby's father, Johnathon] Irish's affiliation with Oath Keepers, which it describes as "a militia," and his purchase of "several different types of weapons including a rifle, handgun and Taser."
Irish said he and the baby's mother, Stephanie Taylor, have been flooded with messages of support and requests for interviews since an interview he did with a self-described "independent journalist" was posted on the oathkeepers.org website. By 5 p.m. yesterday, the audio recording of that interview had gotten more than 17,000 hits on YouTube and sparked a protest outside Concord Hospital.
Irish and Taylor stood at the hospital entrance yesterday, talking with about a half-dozen supporters who were alerted to their case by media and social media reports. Irish wore a "Don't Tread on Me" hat; both were still wearing their hospital wristbands from the baby's birth.
There will be a hearing in the case on Thursday in Rochester Family Court. And Irish said he expects the courtroom will be "packed with a bunch of tea partiers."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Couple: State took our baby" by Daniel Barrick, Concord Monitor staff 10/9/10
[Protesters] said they were outraged that the affidavit supporting the taking of his newborn mentioned Irish's association with a group called the Oath Keepers. The group's website describes it as an affiliation of current and former military and law enforcement members who promise to resist totalitarian actions by the government.
Irish said that on Thursday, one day after Taylor gave birth to their daughter, a group of police officers and state social workers took her from them. He said he and Taylor did not know where their daughter had been taken.
"She's either in the nursery there or in a foster home," said Taylor, who was on hand with Irish to greet protesters and grant interviews.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/14/10: State returns baby to parents, without explanation
The parents may have had a difficult past, but the issue is that the State documents included the father's political affiliation as harmful to children.
-- From "State takes infant, spurs protest" by Shawne K. Wickham, New Hampshire Sunday News Staff 10/9/10
A baby girl [Cheyenne Irish] was taken into state custody at Concord Hospital by child welfare officials [DCYF] on Thursday, just hours after she was born, according to her parents. And now the parents are at the center of an Internet-fueled fire storm over government intervention and parental rights.
In an affidavit supporting its actions, the DCYF . . . notes [the baby's father, Johnathon] Irish's affiliation with Oath Keepers, which it describes as "a militia," and his purchase of "several different types of weapons including a rifle, handgun and Taser."
Irish said he and the baby's mother, Stephanie Taylor, have been flooded with messages of support and requests for interviews since an interview he did with a self-described "independent journalist" was posted on the oathkeepers.org website. By 5 p.m. yesterday, the audio recording of that interview had gotten more than 17,000 hits on YouTube and sparked a protest outside Concord Hospital.
Irish and Taylor stood at the hospital entrance yesterday, talking with about a half-dozen supporters who were alerted to their case by media and social media reports. Irish wore a "Don't Tread on Me" hat; both were still wearing their hospital wristbands from the baby's birth.
There will be a hearing in the case on Thursday in Rochester Family Court. And Irish said he expects the courtroom will be "packed with a bunch of tea partiers."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Couple: State took our baby" by Daniel Barrick, Concord Monitor staff 10/9/10
[Protesters] said they were outraged that the affidavit supporting the taking of his newborn mentioned Irish's association with a group called the Oath Keepers. The group's website describes it as an affiliation of current and former military and law enforcement members who promise to resist totalitarian actions by the government.
Irish said that on Thursday, one day after Taylor gave birth to their daughter, a group of police officers and state social workers took her from them. He said he and Taylor did not know where their daughter had been taken.
"She's either in the nursery there or in a foster home," said Taylor, who was on hand with Irish to greet protesters and grant interviews.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
children,
internet,
kidnapping,
military,
New Hampshire,
parental rights,
police,
Tea Party,
totalitarianism
IL Gov. Candidate OK with 'Teaching Creationism'
While the Republican gubernatorial candidate, Bill Brady, seems to profess an unbiblical belief in BOTH creation and evolution, the liberal media demonstrate their disconnect with prevailing public opinion by painting an appreciation of scientific theories challenging Darwinism as being out of the mainstream.
-- From "Brady OK with schools opting to teach creationism" by Dave McKinney, Chicago Sun-Times Springfield Bureau Chief, 10/5/10
“I believe knowledge is power, and I believe local school districts should establish the curriculum when it comes to those things,” Brady told the Chicago Sun-Times editorial board in a wide-ranging interview session with running mate Jason Plummer.
A chunk of the hour-long session delved into social issues, with Brady stating his opposition to laws authorizing civil unions for gays and lesbians and legalizing marijuana for medical purposes, his unwillingness to expand abortion rights and his desire to lift a moratorium on executions.
Brady was asked repeatedly about his personal views on intelligent design.
“My knowledge and my faith leads me to believe in both evolution and creationism,” he said. “I believe God created the earth, and it evolved.”
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Brady OK with schools opting to teach creationism" by Dave McKinney, Chicago Sun-Times Springfield Bureau Chief, 10/5/10
“I believe knowledge is power, and I believe local school districts should establish the curriculum when it comes to those things,” Brady told the Chicago Sun-Times editorial board in a wide-ranging interview session with running mate Jason Plummer.
A chunk of the hour-long session delved into social issues, with Brady stating his opposition to laws authorizing civil unions for gays and lesbians and legalizing marijuana for medical purposes, his unwillingness to expand abortion rights and his desire to lift a moratorium on executions.
Brady was asked repeatedly about his personal views on intelligent design.
“My knowledge and my faith leads me to believe in both evolution and creationism,” he said. “I believe God created the earth, and it evolved.”
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
anti-Christian,
Darwin,
election,
evolution,
IL,
intelligent design,
media bias,
public schools,
scientist,
vote
Friday, October 08, 2010
Atheists Fail to Stop Prayer at School
Hundreds, maybe even a couple of thousand people, plan to raise their voices reciting The Lord's Prayer before tonight's Lee County High School [Leesburg, GA] football game.
UPDATE 10/9/10: What happened? Most everyone prayed outloud during the "moment of silence"
-- From "Lee Co. High students speak up about not praying at football games" by Megan Naughton, WFXL TV-31 (Albany, GA) 10/7/10
The Lee County High Trojans won’t be starting their football game with an announced prayer Friday night; instead there will be a moment of silence.
Some football players say they're ok with the moment of silence because they say their prayer before they’re even out of the tunnel. However some students in the stands say they’ll be taking that time to pray out loud.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "LCHS fans may recite individual prayers" By Jennifer Emert, WALB TV-10 (Albany, GA) 10/8/10
It's a response the cancellation of public prayers over the stadium's public address system. Someone complained after pastors prayed over the PA before two games this season.
The school system realized they can't legally hold that kind of prayer. Now fans say they'll join together to recite the Lord's Prayer.
Jonathan Lyons helped launch the Facebook page to get people to pray during tonight's moment of silence and he hopes those who do have the right spirit about it. "It's not a spirit of rebellion toward the school or towards anybody else, I just hope people use this opportunity to truly give their spirit," he said.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/9/10: What happened? Most everyone prayed outloud during the "moment of silence"
-- From "Lee Co. High students speak up about not praying at football games" by Megan Naughton, WFXL TV-31 (Albany, GA) 10/7/10
The Lee County High Trojans won’t be starting their football game with an announced prayer Friday night; instead there will be a moment of silence.
Some football players say they're ok with the moment of silence because they say their prayer before they’re even out of the tunnel. However some students in the stands say they’ll be taking that time to pray out loud.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "LCHS fans may recite individual prayers" By Jennifer Emert, WALB TV-10 (Albany, GA) 10/8/10
It's a response the cancellation of public prayers over the stadium's public address system. Someone complained after pastors prayed over the PA before two games this season.
The school system realized they can't legally hold that kind of prayer. Now fans say they'll join together to recite the Lord's Prayer.
Jonathan Lyons helped launch the Facebook page to get people to pray during tonight's moment of silence and he hopes those who do have the right spirit about it. "It's not a spirit of rebellion toward the school or towards anybody else, I just hope people use this opportunity to truly give their spirit," he said.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Dems Emphasize Their Pro-abortion Stance
The Democratic strategy . . . comes with a risk . . . Does selling the idea that Republican fiscal warriors are social zealots in disguise send a shiver of fear down voters’ spines, or make Democrats look like they are avoiding the subject on most voters’ minds?
-- From "Democrats in Tight Races Put Focus on Abortion Rights" by Kirk Johnson, New York Times 10/6/10
Few Democrats think abortion alone will turn this year’s midterm elections for them; polls show Republicans leading in a generic “Which party would you vote for the Congress?” question.
New York Times/CBS News national polls also say that the political divide between men and women — more men than women gravitating toward Republican candidates, a pattern dating back to Ronald Reagan’s election as president in 1980 — is bigger than average heading into November.
“This isn’t a gap, it’s a canyon,” said Susan Carroll, a senior scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, who said the average gender difference in presidential races was about seven or eight percentage points.
To read the entire aricle, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Democrats in Tight Races Put Focus on Abortion Rights" by Kirk Johnson, New York Times 10/6/10
Few Democrats think abortion alone will turn this year’s midterm elections for them; polls show Republicans leading in a generic “Which party would you vote for the Congress?” question.
New York Times/CBS News national polls also say that the political divide between men and women — more men than women gravitating toward Republican candidates, a pattern dating back to Ronald Reagan’s election as president in 1980 — is bigger than average heading into November.
“This isn’t a gap, it’s a canyon,” said Susan Carroll, a senior scholar at the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University, who said the average gender difference in presidential races was about seven or eight percentage points.
To read the entire aricle, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
abortion,
culture war,
Democrat,
election,
female,
feminism,
men,
Republicans,
vote,
women's rights
Thursday, October 07, 2010
Duke Scandal Showcases Sexualized Students
An unfortunate young woman, a product of the all-too-typical public school sexualization of children, and recent graduate of Duke University, chronicled her long list of sexual conquests of student athletes for the world to read.
-- From "Duke Winces as a Private Joke Slips Out of Control" by Katharine Q. Seelye and Liz Robbins, New York Times 10/7/10
The woman in question, Karen Owen, 22, who graduated this year from Duke, evaluated what she said were her sexual liaisons with 13 student-athletes during her years at the school, and she prepared a slide presentation, complete with pictures of her subjects and graphs ranking their performance.
She forwarded this mock thesis in “horizontal academics” to a few friends, who forwarded it to their friends. After percolating within the Duke community for nearly a week, with e-mails reaching alumni overseas and message boards buzzing, the report was published online by two related Web sites, Jezebel and Deadspin. From there, it exploded onto the blogosphere, where as of Thursday it was still being shared via Twitter with the frenzied speed of the Indianapolis 500.
The fake thesis [of claimed-actual events] made its splash just as concern was raised anew about the power of the Internet to invade privacy and, sometimes, destroy lives. Last month, at Rutgers University, a student surreptitiously recorded his male roommate’s encounter with another man; days later, the roommate killed himself, unleashing a national fury about cyberbullying.
Seven of the 13 athletes Ms. Owen wrote about were — or still are — on the lacrosse team. This incident has angered many of those who are already sensitive to their image, according to students and alumni who know them.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Duke Winces as a Private Joke Slips Out of Control" by Katharine Q. Seelye and Liz Robbins, New York Times 10/7/10
The woman in question, Karen Owen, 22, who graduated this year from Duke, evaluated what she said were her sexual liaisons with 13 student-athletes during her years at the school, and she prepared a slide presentation, complete with pictures of her subjects and graphs ranking their performance.
She forwarded this mock thesis in “horizontal academics” to a few friends, who forwarded it to their friends. After percolating within the Duke community for nearly a week, with e-mails reaching alumni overseas and message boards buzzing, the report was published online by two related Web sites, Jezebel and Deadspin. From there, it exploded onto the blogosphere, where as of Thursday it was still being shared via Twitter with the frenzied speed of the Indianapolis 500.
The fake thesis [of claimed-actual events] made its splash just as concern was raised anew about the power of the Internet to invade privacy and, sometimes, destroy lives. Last month, at Rutgers University, a student surreptitiously recorded his male roommate’s encounter with another man; days later, the roommate killed himself, unleashing a national fury about cyberbullying.
Seven of the 13 athletes Ms. Owen wrote about were — or still are — on the lacrosse team. This incident has angered many of those who are already sensitive to their image, according to students and alumni who know them.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
college,
indoctrination,
internet,
NC,
public schools,
sexual immorality,
sexualization,
student,
university
Senator's Law Against Meanness on Campus
For U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J, teaching kindness to students is not enough, rather he will introduce legislation against bullying in an effort to force students to be nice to each other.
Reference previous article: Obama Signs Law to End Christian Witness - 'Hate Crimes'
-- From "N.J. Senator Seeks Anti-Bully Law After Suicide" by The Associated Press 10/7/10
Lautenberg, D-N.J., told the crowd gathered Wednesday night [at Rutgers Univ.] in memory of 18-year-old freshman Tyler Clementi . . . [who] jumped off the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River on Sept. 22 after the intimate images of him with another man were broadcast. . . .
Clementi's roommate, Dharun Ravi, and another Rutgers freshman, Molly Wei, both 18, have been charged with invasion of privacy, and authorities are weighing whether bias crime charges should be added.
Lautenberg said his bill would require colleges and universities that receive federal student aid to create policies prohibiting harassment of any student. Such policies are not currently required by federal law, he said. The bill also would provide funding for schools to establish programs to deter harassment of students.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Reference previous article: Obama Signs Law to End Christian Witness - 'Hate Crimes'
-- From "N.J. Senator Seeks Anti-Bully Law After Suicide" by The Associated Press 10/7/10
Lautenberg, D-N.J., told the crowd gathered Wednesday night [at Rutgers Univ.] in memory of 18-year-old freshman Tyler Clementi . . . [who] jumped off the George Washington Bridge into the Hudson River on Sept. 22 after the intimate images of him with another man were broadcast. . . .
Clementi's roommate, Dharun Ravi, and another Rutgers freshman, Molly Wei, both 18, have been charged with invasion of privacy, and authorities are weighing whether bias crime charges should be added.
Lautenberg said his bill would require colleges and universities that receive federal student aid to create policies prohibiting harassment of any student. Such policies are not currently required by federal law, he said. The bill also would provide funding for schools to establish programs to deter harassment of students.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
'Christian' College Sex Orientation for Freshmen
Covert videos by senior at Gustavus Adolphus College in St. Peter, MN expose overt homosexual and other immoral behavior presented at freshmen orientation sessions.
UPDATE 10/11/10: Video script excerpts, analysis, and opinion
-- From "Church college teaches sex-in-dorm etiquette" by Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily 10/6/10
. . . a presentation to incoming freshmen that introduces them to the etiquette of having sex in dorm rooms without being interrupted by roommates and a "lesbian" who proclaims, "I like sex. No, I love sex" and tells students, "I am normal."
The issue has been raised by student Phil Cleary on his Gustavus.campusreform.org website, where he has posted several videos captured at the 2010 orientation for freshman in the class of 2014.
The videos reveal promotions for the homosexual lifestyle: "Follow along and listen quite clear to learn of the wonderful world of the queer."
The presentation, performed as a series of skits on a stage in a darkened auditorium, explains that "sex" and "gender" are not the same. It includes another character who proclaims, "My atheism is my most important characteristic."
Gustavus, the website states, is "a community where a mature understanding of the Christian faith and lives of service are nurtured and students are encouraged to work toward a just and peaceful world."
The college declined to comment to WND on the issue.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/11/10: Video script excerpts, analysis, and opinion
-- From "Church college teaches sex-in-dorm etiquette" by Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily 10/6/10
. . . a presentation to incoming freshmen that introduces them to the etiquette of having sex in dorm rooms without being interrupted by roommates and a "lesbian" who proclaims, "I like sex. No, I love sex" and tells students, "I am normal."
The issue has been raised by student Phil Cleary on his Gustavus.campusreform.org website, where he has posted several videos captured at the 2010 orientation for freshman in the class of 2014.
The videos reveal promotions for the homosexual lifestyle: "Follow along and listen quite clear to learn of the wonderful world of the queer."
The presentation, performed as a series of skits on a stage in a darkened auditorium, explains that "sex" and "gender" are not the same. It includes another character who proclaims, "My atheism is my most important characteristic."
Gustavus, the website states, is "a community where a mature understanding of the Christian faith and lives of service are nurtured and students are encouraged to work toward a just and peaceful world."
The college declined to comment to WND on the issue.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Wednesday, October 06, 2010
Tea Party = Religious Right, says Liberal Media
A new poll has provided more ammunition to the mainstream media in its attempted smear of the Tea Party movement. These liberal elites assume that this characterization will cause middle America to shun the movement.
-- From "Poll: Tea Partiers back 'Christian conservative agenda'" by Andy Sullivan, Reuters posted at MSNBC.com 10/5/10
Many supporters of the conservative Tea Party movement that has shaken up politics share the same views as the Christian right on social issues like abortion and the role of religion in public life, according to a poll released Tuesday. . . . as the Public Religion Research Institute found in its American Values Survey.
The survey found significant overlap between the Tea Party, made up mostly of Republicans, and the religious right, which has played a significant political role for decades.
Nearly half of those who identify with the Tea Party believe that the Bible is the literal word of God, and a similar proportion thinks that public officials do not pay enough attention to religion, the survey found. They are more likely than the population as a whole to view America as a Christian nation.
"The focus of the movement has changed to one that is much more in line with the full spectrum of conservative political issues," said [Michael] Lindsay, a political sociologist at Rice University in Houston.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Tea party, religious right often overlap, poll shows" by Michelle Boorstein, Washington Post Staff Writer 10/5/10
The new poll . . . showed large swaths of the tea party looking for a strong government role in hot-button social issues. Nearly two-thirds say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, and 45 percent said there should be no legal recognition for same-sex couples.
Mark Rozell, a public policy professor at George Mason University who has written extensively about the religious right, said . . . "Now the word 'conservative' is accepted to mean generally small government in the economic sphere but an activist government on social issues."
A Washington Post poll published Tuesday found more than half of all white evangelicals "support or lean toward supporting the tea party."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Click headlines below for previous articles:
Tea Party Energy is Christian
Liberal Media Paint Tea Party as Christian
Tea Party Christians Await GOP 'Platform'
GOP Ignores Social Conservatives at Own Peril
-- From "Poll: Tea Partiers back 'Christian conservative agenda'" by Andy Sullivan, Reuters posted at MSNBC.com 10/5/10
Many supporters of the conservative Tea Party movement that has shaken up politics share the same views as the Christian right on social issues like abortion and the role of religion in public life, according to a poll released Tuesday. . . . as the Public Religion Research Institute found in its American Values Survey.
The survey found significant overlap between the Tea Party, made up mostly of Republicans, and the religious right, which has played a significant political role for decades.
Nearly half of those who identify with the Tea Party believe that the Bible is the literal word of God, and a similar proportion thinks that public officials do not pay enough attention to religion, the survey found. They are more likely than the population as a whole to view America as a Christian nation.
"The focus of the movement has changed to one that is much more in line with the full spectrum of conservative political issues," said [Michael] Lindsay, a political sociologist at Rice University in Houston.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Tea party, religious right often overlap, poll shows" by Michelle Boorstein, Washington Post Staff Writer 10/5/10
The new poll . . . showed large swaths of the tea party looking for a strong government role in hot-button social issues. Nearly two-thirds say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, and 45 percent said there should be no legal recognition for same-sex couples.
Mark Rozell, a public policy professor at George Mason University who has written extensively about the religious right, said . . . "Now the word 'conservative' is accepted to mean generally small government in the economic sphere but an activist government on social issues."
A Washington Post poll published Tuesday found more than half of all white evangelicals "support or lean toward supporting the tea party."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Click headlines below for previous articles:
Tea Party Energy is Christian
Liberal Media Paint Tea Party as Christian
Tea Party Christians Await GOP 'Platform'
GOP Ignores Social Conservatives at Own Peril
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
Christian Denounces Univ. Homosexual Leader
An assistant attorney general [Andrew Shirvell] is using his personal blog to target the openly gay leader of the University of Michigan's student assembly, calling him a racist with a "radical homosexual agenda." The lawyer claims that when he's not at work, he has the right to say whatever he wants.
-- From "About 50 people rally at University of Michigan" posted at The Flint Journal 10/5/10
Students and faculty rallied Tuesday at the University of Michigan-Flint in support of the first openly gay student body president at UM-Ann Arbor [Chris Armstrong].
UM-Flint Communication Professor Dr. Marcus Paroske spoke about the importance of getting rational ideas out in an unfiltered, communications age.
"We used Facebook and our natural lines of communication to disseminate information about the rally," Joseph Patterson, student body president said before the Willson Park event.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Free Speech? Michigan Assistant Attorney General's Blog Targets Homosexual Student Leader" by Kathy Barks Hoffman, Associated Press 10/1/10
Attorney General Mike Cox . . . called Shirvell immature and his blog posts "distasteful," but said he has the right to free speech.
Shirvell has repeatedly called on Armstrong to resign. He has criticized Armstrong's friends and put their Facebook postings on his blog.
The university on Thursday banned Shirvell from campus, where he earned a bachelor's degree in 2002, saying he was targeting the elected student body president "in a reprehensible manner."
"This is just another tactic bringing awareness to what Chris really stands for," Shirvell said. "The substance of the matter is, Chris Armstrong is a radical homosexual activist who got elected partly funded by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund to promote a very deeply radical agenda at the University of Michigan. ... I'm a Christian citizen exercising my First Amendment rights."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "About 50 people rally at University of Michigan" posted at The Flint Journal 10/5/10
Students and faculty rallied Tuesday at the University of Michigan-Flint in support of the first openly gay student body president at UM-Ann Arbor [Chris Armstrong].
UM-Flint Communication Professor Dr. Marcus Paroske spoke about the importance of getting rational ideas out in an unfiltered, communications age.
"We used Facebook and our natural lines of communication to disseminate information about the rally," Joseph Patterson, student body president said before the Willson Park event.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Free Speech? Michigan Assistant Attorney General's Blog Targets Homosexual Student Leader" by Kathy Barks Hoffman, Associated Press 10/1/10
Attorney General Mike Cox . . . called Shirvell immature and his blog posts "distasteful," but said he has the right to free speech.
Shirvell has repeatedly called on Armstrong to resign. He has criticized Armstrong's friends and put their Facebook postings on his blog.
The university on Thursday banned Shirvell from campus, where he earned a bachelor's degree in 2002, saying he was targeting the elected student body president "in a reprehensible manner."
"This is just another tactic bringing awareness to what Chris really stands for," Shirvell said. "The substance of the matter is, Chris Armstrong is a radical homosexual activist who got elected partly funded by the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund to promote a very deeply radical agenda at the University of Michigan. ... I'm a Christian citizen exercising my First Amendment rights."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Jesus Desecrated, NO Violence Breaks Out
Colorado art exhibit includes print of an image of Jesus receiving oral sex; protests ensue, but no one threatens the artist or commences violence of any kind.
UPDATE 10/6/10: Lone 56-year-old woman whacks artwork with crowbar
-- From "Art Exhibit Depicting Jesus in a Sex Act Sparks Outrage in Colorado" by Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/4/10
Enrique Chagoya's "The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals," created in 2003, is a multipanel piece in which "cultural and religious icons are presented with humor and placed in contradictory, unexpected and sometimes controversial contexts," the artist's publisher, Shark's Ink, said on its website.
Dozens of protesters gathered at the museum over the weekend to object to Chagoya's work, including Loveland Councilman Daryle Klassen . . .
"This is a taxpayer-supported, public museum and it’s family-friendly," Donna Rice, another member of the city council, told the Denver Post. "This is not something the community can be proud of."
"It is visual profanity," Linda King, an art gallery owner, told the Loveland Reporter-Herald. "It disgraces the God of all creation."
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/6/10: Lone 56-year-old woman whacks artwork with crowbar
-- From "Art Exhibit Depicting Jesus in a Sex Act Sparks Outrage in Colorado" by Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/4/10
Enrique Chagoya's "The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals," created in 2003, is a multipanel piece in which "cultural and religious icons are presented with humor and placed in contradictory, unexpected and sometimes controversial contexts," the artist's publisher, Shark's Ink, said on its website.
Dozens of protesters gathered at the museum over the weekend to object to Chagoya's work, including Loveland Councilman Daryle Klassen . . .
"This is a taxpayer-supported, public museum and it’s family-friendly," Donna Rice, another member of the city council, told the Denver Post. "This is not something the community can be proud of."
"It is visual profanity," Linda King, an art gallery owner, told the Loveland Reporter-Herald. "It disgraces the God of all creation."
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
anti-Christian,
CO,
freedom of speech,
islam,
muslim,
obscenity,
profanity,
taxpayer funding
Abortion Clinic Shut Down During Prayer Vigil
A South Carolina SWAT team shut down an abortion clinic for two hours (halting scheduled abortions), and arrested the angry abortionist who pulled a gun on pro-lifers peacefully praying as part of the national 40 Days for Life campaign.
-- From "Police: Abortion doctor pulls gun" by Allyson Bird, The Post and Courier (Charleston, SC) 10/3/10
For the past 11 days, anti-abortion demonstrators have gathered at the Charleston Women's Medical Center in West Ashley as part of the annual "40 Days for Life" movement against abortion, each of them signing a "statement of peace" before participating.
Police say the protest met a threat Saturday morning when an out-of-state abortion doctor flashed a gun at them.
Police arrested Gary Boyle, 62, a Blountville, Tenn., physician, on charges of pointing a firearm.
Boyle drove into the parking lot of the clinic on Ashley River Road near Fuseler Road at around 8:30 a.m. When three protesters, including a 17-year-old boy, approached him, Boyle brandished a black handgun loaded with 15 rounds, according to a police report.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Abortion Practitioner Pulls Gun at Praying Pro-Life Advocates in South Carolina" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/4/10
Boyle has had legal problems before as he and his business partner ran in trouble in Tennessee because they did not have the proper papers from the state to run their abortion business. The health department tried to close the abortion center, but a state judge eventually ruled the paperwork requirement was unconstitutional.
Boyle's arrest comes two months after a man was arrested outside a late-term abortion facility in New Mexico after he threatened to shoot two pro-life women providing alternatives to women going to the Southwestern Women's Options abortion center.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Police: Abortion doctor pulls gun" by Allyson Bird, The Post and Courier (Charleston, SC) 10/3/10
For the past 11 days, anti-abortion demonstrators have gathered at the Charleston Women's Medical Center in West Ashley as part of the annual "40 Days for Life" movement against abortion, each of them signing a "statement of peace" before participating.
Police say the protest met a threat Saturday morning when an out-of-state abortion doctor flashed a gun at them.
Police arrested Gary Boyle, 62, a Blountville, Tenn., physician, on charges of pointing a firearm.
Boyle drove into the parking lot of the clinic on Ashley River Road near Fuseler Road at around 8:30 a.m. When three protesters, including a 17-year-old boy, approached him, Boyle brandished a black handgun loaded with 15 rounds, according to a police report.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Abortion Practitioner Pulls Gun at Praying Pro-Life Advocates in South Carolina" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/4/10
Boyle has had legal problems before as he and his business partner ran in trouble in Tennessee because they did not have the proper papers from the state to run their abortion business. The health department tried to close the abortion center, but a state judge eventually ruled the paperwork requirement was unconstitutional.
Boyle's arrest comes two months after a man was arrested outside a late-term abortion facility in New Mexico after he threatened to shoot two pro-life women providing alternatives to women going to the Southwestern Women's Options abortion center.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
abortion,
abortion clinic,
anti-Christian,
arrest,
police,
prayer,
pro-life activists,
SC
Monday, October 04, 2010
Scientists Judge Unborn, Kill Unwanted
In vitro fertilization specialists have learned how to enable unnatural human conception, and now will judge the usefulness and/or viability of each life, and systematically kill the unworthy, as they choose.
One scientist said, "If you watch the videos, this is how life begins."
-- From "Human embryos' odds of survival can be predicted" by Erin Allday, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer, 10/4/10
Stanford researchers who studied and photographed human embryos for the first five days after fertilization say they have found a way to accurately predict which embryos will reach an important developmental milestone - and may be the most likely to lead to healthy pregnancies.
. . . The Stanford researchers were able to determine with 93 percent accuracy which newly fertilized eggs would become blastocysts, and which would stop growing and die before they reached that stage.
That could eliminate the need to implant two or more embryos at once to increase the chance of a single birth. And it could allow specialists to implant sooner after fertilization, which most doctors believe leads to fewer complications and better chances of a pregnancy.
But they noted that the Stanford study only predicted whether the embryos would become healthy blastocysts. Whether it can predict healthy pregnancies remains to be seen.
The embryos in the study were created at an in vitro fertilization program in Illinois that is now closed; the patients gave consent for their embryos to be used in research.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Watch the time-lapse video; which of the unborn will be washed down the sink?
One scientist said, "If you watch the videos, this is how life begins."
-- From "Human embryos' odds of survival can be predicted" by Erin Allday, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer, 10/4/10
Stanford researchers who studied and photographed human embryos for the first five days after fertilization say they have found a way to accurately predict which embryos will reach an important developmental milestone - and may be the most likely to lead to healthy pregnancies.
. . . The Stanford researchers were able to determine with 93 percent accuracy which newly fertilized eggs would become blastocysts, and which would stop growing and die before they reached that stage.
That could eliminate the need to implant two or more embryos at once to increase the chance of a single birth. And it could allow specialists to implant sooner after fertilization, which most doctors believe leads to fewer complications and better chances of a pregnancy.
But they noted that the Stanford study only predicted whether the embryos would become healthy blastocysts. Whether it can predict healthy pregnancies remains to be seen.
The embryos in the study were created at an in vitro fertilization program in Illinois that is now closed; the patients gave consent for their embryos to be used in research.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Watch the time-lapse video; which of the unborn will be washed down the sink?
Rev. Graham Loves Muslim People, Hates Islam
Rev. Franklin Graham, the son of Rev. Billy Graham, called Islam “wicked” and “evil” . . .
“They want to build as many mosques and cultural centers as they possibly can so they can convert as many Americans as they can to Islam.”

-- From "Rev. Franklin Graham: Islam 'evil'" by Carol E. Lee, Politico 10/3/10
Graham also said the Islamic center near ground zero should not be built, although he said Muslims “absolutely have the right to build a mosque or cultural center in this country.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
In this main segment of the ABC News debate (video below), secularists insist that Christianity is pluralistic (encompassing varying belief systems), and likewise Islam is not defined by any one sect:

From "Heated Debate Over Place of Islam in the United States" by Joshua Miller and Jack Date, ABC News 10/3/10
. . . the Revered said. "And I understand what they're doing. ... But let me just say something about Islam. I love the Muslim people. But I have great difficulty with the religion, especially with Sharia law and what it does for women -- toward women, toward non-believers, the violence that is given in -- under Sharia law," Graham told the town hall audience.
"I think to take your daughter, because you think that -- and the religion gives you the authority -- Sharia gives you the authority for honor killing. And we saw the young girl in Ohio just a few --" Graham began to say, but was interrupted by Imam Ossama Bahloul, the leader of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, Tenn.
"It does not," Bahloul said. "Listen, we have some people, Christians, Muslims, Jewish and other, who misuse the holy books. It's understandable. I do not deny this," he said. "But it's something the extreme majority of the Muslims, they have a proper understanding about this religion."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
“They want to build as many mosques and cultural centers as they possibly can so they can convert as many Americans as they can to Islam.”
-- From "Rev. Franklin Graham: Islam 'evil'" by Carol E. Lee, Politico 10/3/10
Graham also said the Islamic center near ground zero should not be built, although he said Muslims “absolutely have the right to build a mosque or cultural center in this country.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
In this main segment of the ABC News debate (video below), secularists insist that Christianity is pluralistic (encompassing varying belief systems), and likewise Islam is not defined by any one sect:
From "Heated Debate Over Place of Islam in the United States" by Joshua Miller and Jack Date, ABC News 10/3/10
. . . the Revered said. "And I understand what they're doing. ... But let me just say something about Islam. I love the Muslim people. But I have great difficulty with the religion, especially with Sharia law and what it does for women -- toward women, toward non-believers, the violence that is given in -- under Sharia law," Graham told the town hall audience.
"I think to take your daughter, because you think that -- and the religion gives you the authority -- Sharia gives you the authority for honor killing. And we saw the young girl in Ohio just a few --" Graham began to say, but was interrupted by Imam Ossama Bahloul, the leader of the Islamic Center of Murfreesboro, Tenn.
"It does not," Bahloul said. "Listen, we have some people, Christians, Muslims, Jewish and other, who misuse the holy books. It's understandable. I do not deny this," he said. "But it's something the extreme majority of the Muslims, they have a proper understanding about this religion."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
American Muslims,
evangelicals,
islam,
muslim,
muslim activists,
NY,
Sharia,
terrorism,
women's rights
Sunday, October 03, 2010
Homosexualists Intend to Control Both GOP & Dems
Just as "corporate America" donates to politicians of all stripes, homosexualist support is not confined to the Democrat party. Closeted GOP gays are favored by homosexualists, such as Illinois Republican Congressmen Mark Kirk and Aaron Schock, as they are easily controlled using threats of being "outed" with full documentation.
-- From "They're gay, conservative and proud" by Ben Smith, Politico 9/25/10
GOProud is an explicitly [right-wing] gay group that isn’t particularly focused on gay rights . . .
The gay right is thriving at a moment that the mainstream [Democrat] gay rights movement faces a profound crisis.
The gay right . . . has taken its place at the vanguard. Former Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman used his coming out as gay last month to raise more than $1 million for the legal effort, led in part by former Bush administration Solicitor General Ted Olson, to win a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The plaintiffs in a California lawsuit in which a district court judge ruled “Don’t ask, don't tell” unconstitutional this year, meanwhile, were the [pro-homosexual] Log Cabin Republicans. . . .
[GOProud conference] Attendees struggled to characterize the momentum they feel on the right at large and the gay rights in particular. One, [pro-abortion lesbian] radio host Tammy Bruce, who is on GOProud’s board, said the moment has the “same energy” as the radical ACT-UP protests in the 1980s, which drew attention to the AIDS crisis.
Another, former New York Log Cabin GOP chief Chris Taylor, said people are discovering what he’s always found self-evident: “I don’t see what being gay has to do with being socialist,” he said.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "They're gay, conservative and proud" by Ben Smith, Politico 9/25/10
GOProud is an explicitly [right-wing] gay group that isn’t particularly focused on gay rights . . .
The gay right is thriving at a moment that the mainstream [Democrat] gay rights movement faces a profound crisis.
The gay right . . . has taken its place at the vanguard. Former Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman used his coming out as gay last month to raise more than $1 million for the legal effort, led in part by former Bush administration Solicitor General Ted Olson, to win a constitutional right to same-sex marriage. The plaintiffs in a California lawsuit in which a district court judge ruled “Don’t ask, don't tell” unconstitutional this year, meanwhile, were the [pro-homosexual] Log Cabin Republicans. . . .
[GOProud conference] Attendees struggled to characterize the momentum they feel on the right at large and the gay rights in particular. One, [pro-abortion lesbian] radio host Tammy Bruce, who is on GOProud’s board, said the moment has the “same energy” as the radical ACT-UP protests in the 1980s, which drew attention to the AIDS crisis.
Another, former New York Log Cabin GOP chief Chris Taylor, said people are discovering what he’s always found self-evident: “I don’t see what being gay has to do with being socialist,” he said.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
election,
gay agenda,
homosexual activists,
homosexuality,
Mark Kirk,
politicians,
Republicans,
vote
Creator Systematically Deleted from American History
President Obama and other secularists are routinely omitting references to God, The Creator, from America's founding documents and even from Abraham Lincoln.
UPDATE 6/20/11: Obama omits ‘Creator’ when referencing the Declaration of Independence to homosexualist audience
UPDATE 12/7/10: "In God We Trust" no longer nation motto, per President Obama
UPDATE 10/25/10 VIDEO - U.S. Representative Betty McCollum, D-Minn., omits "under God" from Pledge of Allegiance
UPDATE 10/25/10: President Obama began reinserting "Creator" in speeches beginning last Friday
UPDATE 10/19/10: Clearly, President Obama is purposely omitting "Creator" -- numerous times now
-- From "Obama Again Omits ‘Creator’ When Speaking of ‘Inalienable Rights’ Cited in Declaration of Independence" by Terence P. Jeffrey, CNSNews.com 9/27/10
Just seven days after he sparked controversy by omitting the word “Creator” when he closely paraphrased the passage from the Declaration of Independence that says all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” President Barack Obama again omitted the Creator when speaking about the “inalienable rights” that “everybody is endowed with.”
This time the president was speaking at a Sept. 22 fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, and his reference to “inalienable rights” was not as close a paraphrasing of the Declaration as it had been the week before.
Speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s Annual Awards Gala on Sept. 15, Obama had left out the word “Creator” when otherwise virtually quoting from the Declaration of Independence.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident,” Obama said at that event, “that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That’s what makes us unique.”
On Sept. 17, 2009 . . . Obama issued a “Constitution Day and Citizenship Day” proclamation that mentioned man's “certain unalienable rights” but not the Creator who endows man with them.
This proclamation was issued in both Spanish and English—with neither versions mentioning the Creator.
On Feb. 2, 2009, Obama issued a presidential proclamation for “National African American History Month” that mentioned “certain unalienable rights” Obama said "we all are endowed with" but did not mention the Creator . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "One’s a Point, Two’s a Trend; Will Three Make A Pattern?" by Gregory S. Baylor, ADF Senior Counsel 9/22/10
There’s an old adage that one’s a point, two’s a trend, and three’s a pattern.
A few weeks ago, I observed that the U.S. State Department said in a U.N. report that “all are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights” without mentioning the Source of those inalienable rights — something the Founders deemed a self-evident truth in the Declaration of Independence.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "God and Gettysburg" by Robert P. George, Princeton University, posted at First Things Aug/Sep 2010
On the cover [of a pamphlet] was the logo of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, an influential organization whose boardmembers include former New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse, controversial Obama judicial nominee Goodwin Liu, former New York governor Mario Cuomo, former solicitors general Drew Days and Walter Dellinger, and former attorney general Janet Reno. The new Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was a speaker at the society’s annual conventions in 2005, 2007, and 2008. And inside the pamphlet was a page saying, “The printing of this copy of the U.S. Constitution and of the nation’s two other founding texts, the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address, was made possible through the generosity of Laurence and Carolyn Tribe.”
. . . What’s missing is Lincoln’s description of the United States as a nation under God. What Lincoln actually said at Gettysburg was: “that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.” The American Constitution Society had omitted Lincoln’s reference to the United States as a nation under God from the address he gave at the dedication of the burial ground at Gettysburg.
. . . from 2000 to 2004, the atheist Michael Newdow was challenging in court the inclusion of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance . . .
Newdow has cycled back into the news in recent months with a new case that was appealed to the Supreme Court in March 2010, but what he and his supporters have avoided mentioning is that the pledge’s words under God were not pulled from a sermon by Billy Graham or a papal encyclical. They were taken from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. The pledge, as amended, simply quotes one of our nation’s founding texts.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 6/20/11: Obama omits ‘Creator’ when referencing the Declaration of Independence to homosexualist audience
UPDATE 12/7/10: "In God We Trust" no longer nation motto, per President Obama
UPDATE 10/25/10 VIDEO - U.S. Representative Betty McCollum, D-Minn., omits "under God" from Pledge of Allegiance
UPDATE 10/25/10: President Obama began reinserting "Creator" in speeches beginning last Friday
UPDATE 10/19/10: Clearly, President Obama is purposely omitting "Creator" -- numerous times now
-- From "Obama Again Omits ‘Creator’ When Speaking of ‘Inalienable Rights’ Cited in Declaration of Independence" by Terence P. Jeffrey, CNSNews.com 9/27/10
Just seven days after he sparked controversy by omitting the word “Creator” when he closely paraphrased the passage from the Declaration of Independence that says all men “are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights,” President Barack Obama again omitted the Creator when speaking about the “inalienable rights” that “everybody is endowed with.”
This time the president was speaking at a Sept. 22 fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York City, and his reference to “inalienable rights” was not as close a paraphrasing of the Declaration as it had been the week before.
Speaking at the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s Annual Awards Gala on Sept. 15, Obama had left out the word “Creator” when otherwise virtually quoting from the Declaration of Independence.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident,” Obama said at that event, “that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights: life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That’s what makes us unique.”
On Sept. 17, 2009 . . . Obama issued a “Constitution Day and Citizenship Day” proclamation that mentioned man's “certain unalienable rights” but not the Creator who endows man with them.
This proclamation was issued in both Spanish and English—with neither versions mentioning the Creator.
On Feb. 2, 2009, Obama issued a presidential proclamation for “National African American History Month” that mentioned “certain unalienable rights” Obama said "we all are endowed with" but did not mention the Creator . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "One’s a Point, Two’s a Trend; Will Three Make A Pattern?" by Gregory S. Baylor, ADF Senior Counsel 9/22/10
There’s an old adage that one’s a point, two’s a trend, and three’s a pattern.
A few weeks ago, I observed that the U.S. State Department said in a U.N. report that “all are created equal and endowed with inalienable rights” without mentioning the Source of those inalienable rights — something the Founders deemed a self-evident truth in the Declaration of Independence.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "God and Gettysburg" by Robert P. George, Princeton University, posted at First Things Aug/Sep 2010
On the cover [of a pamphlet] was the logo of the American Constitution Society for Law and Policy, an influential organization whose boardmembers include former New York Times Supreme Court reporter Linda Greenhouse, controversial Obama judicial nominee Goodwin Liu, former New York governor Mario Cuomo, former solicitors general Drew Days and Walter Dellinger, and former attorney general Janet Reno. The new Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan was a speaker at the society’s annual conventions in 2005, 2007, and 2008. And inside the pamphlet was a page saying, “The printing of this copy of the U.S. Constitution and of the nation’s two other founding texts, the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address, was made possible through the generosity of Laurence and Carolyn Tribe.”
. . . What’s missing is Lincoln’s description of the United States as a nation under God. What Lincoln actually said at Gettysburg was: “that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.” The American Constitution Society had omitted Lincoln’s reference to the United States as a nation under God from the address he gave at the dedication of the burial ground at Gettysburg.
. . . from 2000 to 2004, the atheist Michael Newdow was challenging in court the inclusion of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance . . .
Newdow has cycled back into the news in recent months with a new case that was appealed to the Supreme Court in March 2010, but what he and his supporters have avoided mentioning is that the pledge’s words under God were not pulled from a sermon by Billy Graham or a papal encyclical. They were taken from Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. The pledge, as amended, simply quotes one of our nation’s founding texts.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
America,
atheism,
Obama,
secularization,
separation of church and state
Saturday, October 02, 2010
San Fran. Sado-masochistic Event Draws Politicians
California's annual Folsom Street Fair of sexual deviancy is routinely ignored by the mainstream media, and treated as commonplace by the local media.
"Other places try, but there's nothing on this scale. And you'd never see the public nudity."
Click here for photos.
-- From "Folsom Street Fair: Hot weather for leather" by John King, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer 9/27/10
. . . Sunday's 27th annual Folsom Street Fair, where bare buttocks and leather harnesses were common sights as hundreds of thousands of people came in close contact on a hot afternoon.
The 5-block-long fair was the centerpiece of San Francisco Leather Week, billed by nonprofit Folsom Street Events as "one of the most beloved fetish events in the world."
There was a raised stage where flogging was performed and a spanking booth where proceeds went to charity. Vendors included Quality Whips, Eternity Collars and Simply Latex.
The fair celebrates aggressive sexuality.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Also read previous article, Just Another Public Sex Fest in San Fran.
"Other places try, but there's nothing on this scale. And you'd never see the public nudity."
Click here for photos.
-- From "Folsom Street Fair: Hot weather for leather" by John King, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer 9/27/10
. . . Sunday's 27th annual Folsom Street Fair, where bare buttocks and leather harnesses were common sights as hundreds of thousands of people came in close contact on a hot afternoon.
The 5-block-long fair was the centerpiece of San Francisco Leather Week, billed by nonprofit Folsom Street Events as "one of the most beloved fetish events in the world."
There was a raised stage where flogging was performed and a spanking booth where proceeds went to charity. Vendors included Quality Whips, Eternity Collars and Simply Latex.
The fair celebrates aggressive sexuality.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Also read previous article, Just Another Public Sex Fest in San Fran.
Labels:
CA,
Folsom Street Fair,
gay agenda,
homosexuality,
Leather,
public sex,
sado-masochism,
San Francisco
Obama Funds Teaching Sex, not Abstinence
Despite documented success of abstinence education (click for evidence), proving Obama wrong, his administration plows forward to strip funding of abstinence education in favor of programs sexualizing children.
UPDATE 3/7/14: Obama Wants an End to Abstinence, Favors Anal Sex
UPDATE 10/3/10: Abortionists praise Feds' sex training programs for kids
UPDATE 11/17/09: Federal Report Supports Obama's Abstinence Termination
For background, read Obamanomics: Abstinence Funding Out, Taxpayer Abortion In and also read ObamaCare Means More Teen Sex, Less Abstinence
-- From "Shift in federal sex-ed funding" by Winston-Salem Journal Staff and Wire Reports, Associated Press 10/2/10
For the first time in more than 10 years, the federal government is paying for sex-education programs that aren’t based solely on abstinence. But they’re not just about handing out condoms, either.
Beginning this school year, a five-year, $375 million grant is being divided among 28 programs that have been proven to lower the pregnancy rate among participants, no matter their focus. Many programs distribute condoms, but about half also aim to improve teenagers’ academics, get them involved in extracurricular activities and even improve their parents’ job status.
The approach of talking to students about goals, which has become popular in the safe-sex community in the past 10 years, will replace the abstinence-centered talks financed by a Republican Congress in the late 1990s and later under President George W. Bush to the tune of $1.5 billion.
Almost all U.S. teens have had formal sex education, but only about two-thirds have been taught birth-control methods, according to a CDC report released Sept. 15.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Sex education program to be expanded" by Richard A. Marini, San Antonio Express-News 10/1/10
A pair of grants totaling $10 million over five years will allow a sex education program run by the University of Texas Health Science Center to expand its reach into the upper high school grades.
The recently announced grants — one for $1.2 million annually from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the other for $850,000 annually from the Department of Health and Human Services — will expand the program into the 10th through 12th grades in six school districts primarily on the South and Southwest sides.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 3/7/14: Obama Wants an End to Abstinence, Favors Anal Sex
UPDATE 10/3/10: Abortionists praise Feds' sex training programs for kids
UPDATE 11/17/09: Federal Report Supports Obama's Abstinence Termination
For background, read Obamanomics: Abstinence Funding Out, Taxpayer Abortion In and also read ObamaCare Means More Teen Sex, Less Abstinence
-- From "Shift in federal sex-ed funding" by Winston-Salem Journal Staff and Wire Reports, Associated Press 10/2/10
For the first time in more than 10 years, the federal government is paying for sex-education programs that aren’t based solely on abstinence. But they’re not just about handing out condoms, either.
Beginning this school year, a five-year, $375 million grant is being divided among 28 programs that have been proven to lower the pregnancy rate among participants, no matter their focus. Many programs distribute condoms, but about half also aim to improve teenagers’ academics, get them involved in extracurricular activities and even improve their parents’ job status.
The approach of talking to students about goals, which has become popular in the safe-sex community in the past 10 years, will replace the abstinence-centered talks financed by a Republican Congress in the late 1990s and later under President George W. Bush to the tune of $1.5 billion.
Almost all U.S. teens have had formal sex education, but only about two-thirds have been taught birth-control methods, according to a CDC report released Sept. 15.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Sex education program to be expanded" by Richard A. Marini, San Antonio Express-News 10/1/10
A pair of grants totaling $10 million over five years will allow a sex education program run by the University of Texas Health Science Center to expand its reach into the upper high school grades.
The recently announced grants — one for $1.2 million annually from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the other for $850,000 annually from the Department of Health and Human Services — will expand the program into the 10th through 12th grades in six school districts primarily on the South and Southwest sides.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Europeans React to Islamization
France is home to five million Muslims, the largest population in Europe, which may explain why it has an identity crisis. Like many Europeans nations, it is suffering the consequences of a decades-long open-borders policy that has allowed Muslims to establish enclaves across the country, particularly in Paris, where rioting Muslims sent the city up in flames in November, 2008.
UPDATE 1/5/11: British conversions to Islam nearly doubled in decade, study says
UPDATE 12/16/10: Wikileaks shines light on Muslim radicals in the U.K.
UPDATE 10/9/10: Sharia law being used in Germany in Muslims' domestic disputes
UPDATE 10/7/10: Muslims are taking over parts of the world into which they move simply by outnumbering the previous residents
UPDATE 10/7/10: Italy to become next European country to ban burka
-- From "France In Trouble Over Immigrants" posted at The New American 9/15/10
Trying to control the increasing Islamization of its society, the French Senate passed a bill that forbids women from wearing the burqa and other face-hiding veils in public. The vote was nearly unamious, 246-1. The Senate's action follows that of the country's National Assembly, which acted in June and also passed the bill by a large margin. The bill awaits the singnature of French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
But whatever the reason women may no longer cover their faces in public, the country's radical Left, as expected, chalks the action up to Islamophobia.
. . . In 2009, the Swiss banned the Muslim minaret, described by Turkish President Recep Erdogan as the "Muslim Bayonet." That law sent European leftists into a tizzy.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Analysis: Burqa bans: France, then Netherlands - who's next?" by Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor, Reuters 10/1/10
First the French banned Muslim face veils, now the Dutch have decided to follow suit. With debates about outlawing burqas and niqabs spreading across Europe, a third ban -- perhaps even more -- may not be far behind.
Calls for a "burqa ban" are now heard across Europe, with local politics influencing how close it gets to becoming law.
Three days after Paris passed its ban last month, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's populist Northern League allies introduced a similar bill in Rome. Another Berlusconi ally submitted a draft ban law in the Senate last week.
[In Spain,] Barcelona outlawed burqas and niqabs in public buildings in June, after two smaller Catalan towns, Lerida and El Vendrell, banned them early this year.
A recent poll showed 61 percent of Germans favored a burqa ban but the debate there has focused more on a dispute caused by Thilo Sarrazin, who had to resign from the board of the central bank after publishing a book denigrating Muslim immigrants.
In Austria, the opposition Freedom Party has been gaining ground in state polls with its anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant line. Socialist Chancellor Werner Faymann says he "could imagine" a ban and his conservative coalition partners want to debate it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "French Senate passes ban on full Muslim veils" by Elaine Ganley, Associated Press Writer 9/14/10
Many Muslims believe the [veil-ban] legislation is one more blow to France's No. 2 religion, and risks raising the level of Islamophobia in a country where mosques, like synagogues, are sporadic targets of hate. However, the law's many proponents say it will preserve the nation's values, including its secular foundations and a notion of fraternity that is contrary to those who hide their faces.
The bill is aimed at ensuring gender equality, women's dignity and security, as well as upholding France's secular values — and its way of life.
Muslim leaders concur that Islam does not require a woman to hide her face. However, they have voiced concerns that a law forbidding them to do so would stigmatize the French Muslim population, which at an estimated 5 million is the largest in western Europe. Numerous Muslim women who wear the face-covering veil have said they are being increasingly harassed in the streets.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/4/10: From "Muslims should conform to German values: Merkel" by Indo-Asian News Service
German Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded on Monday that Muslims living in Germany conform to "fundamental German values", saying there was no leeway on the issue.
"There is no leeway on this," she said, adding that Germans' perceptions of Islam were dominated by Sharia (Islamic law), the lack of equality between men and women and honour killings.
Germany had freedom of religion, and Islam was welcome, "but it must be a form of Islam that feels devoted to our fundamental values", Merkel said. If it were not, fears would develop among Germans, "and that is hardly something we want to happen".
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Read also, Cardinal Says Secularization of Europe has Doomed it to Islamization
UPDATE 1/5/11: British conversions to Islam nearly doubled in decade, study says
UPDATE 12/16/10: Wikileaks shines light on Muslim radicals in the U.K.
UPDATE 10/9/10: Sharia law being used in Germany in Muslims' domestic disputes
UPDATE 10/7/10: Muslims are taking over parts of the world into which they move simply by outnumbering the previous residents
UPDATE 10/7/10: Italy to become next European country to ban burka
-- From "France In Trouble Over Immigrants" posted at The New American 9/15/10
Trying to control the increasing Islamization of its society, the French Senate passed a bill that forbids women from wearing the burqa and other face-hiding veils in public. The vote was nearly unamious, 246-1. The Senate's action follows that of the country's National Assembly, which acted in June and also passed the bill by a large margin. The bill awaits the singnature of French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
But whatever the reason women may no longer cover their faces in public, the country's radical Left, as expected, chalks the action up to Islamophobia.
. . . In 2009, the Swiss banned the Muslim minaret, described by Turkish President Recep Erdogan as the "Muslim Bayonet." That law sent European leftists into a tizzy.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Analysis: Burqa bans: France, then Netherlands - who's next?" by Tom Heneghan, Religion Editor, Reuters 10/1/10
First the French banned Muslim face veils, now the Dutch have decided to follow suit. With debates about outlawing burqas and niqabs spreading across Europe, a third ban -- perhaps even more -- may not be far behind.
Calls for a "burqa ban" are now heard across Europe, with local politics influencing how close it gets to becoming law.
Three days after Paris passed its ban last month, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's populist Northern League allies introduced a similar bill in Rome. Another Berlusconi ally submitted a draft ban law in the Senate last week.
[In Spain,] Barcelona outlawed burqas and niqabs in public buildings in June, after two smaller Catalan towns, Lerida and El Vendrell, banned them early this year.
A recent poll showed 61 percent of Germans favored a burqa ban but the debate there has focused more on a dispute caused by Thilo Sarrazin, who had to resign from the board of the central bank after publishing a book denigrating Muslim immigrants.
In Austria, the opposition Freedom Party has been gaining ground in state polls with its anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant line. Socialist Chancellor Werner Faymann says he "could imagine" a ban and his conservative coalition partners want to debate it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "French Senate passes ban on full Muslim veils" by Elaine Ganley, Associated Press Writer 9/14/10
Many Muslims believe the [veil-ban] legislation is one more blow to France's No. 2 religion, and risks raising the level of Islamophobia in a country where mosques, like synagogues, are sporadic targets of hate. However, the law's many proponents say it will preserve the nation's values, including its secular foundations and a notion of fraternity that is contrary to those who hide their faces.
The bill is aimed at ensuring gender equality, women's dignity and security, as well as upholding France's secular values — and its way of life.
Muslim leaders concur that Islam does not require a woman to hide her face. However, they have voiced concerns that a law forbidding them to do so would stigmatize the French Muslim population, which at an estimated 5 million is the largest in western Europe. Numerous Muslim women who wear the face-covering veil have said they are being increasingly harassed in the streets.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/4/10: From "Muslims should conform to German values: Merkel" by Indo-Asian News Service
German Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded on Monday that Muslims living in Germany conform to "fundamental German values", saying there was no leeway on the issue.
"There is no leeway on this," she said, adding that Germans' perceptions of Islam were dominated by Sharia (Islamic law), the lack of equality between men and women and honour killings.
Germany had freedom of religion, and Islam was welcome, "but it must be a form of Islam that feels devoted to our fundamental values", Merkel said. If it were not, fears would develop among Germans, "and that is hardly something we want to happen".
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Read also, Cardinal Says Secularization of Europe has Doomed it to Islamization
Friday, October 01, 2010
Stem Cell Science Advances Without Embryos
Scientists have invented an efficient way to produce apparently safe alternatives to human embryonic stem cells without destroying embryos, a long-sought step toward bypassing the moral morass surrounding one of the most promising fields in medicine.
For background, read Embryonic Stem Cells Fail Where Other Research Advances
UPDATE 4/5/16: Stem Cell Breakthrough Means Embryos Needn't Be Killed
-- From "Cell technique works without embryos" by Rob Stein, Washington Post Staff Writer 10/1/10
A team of researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute in Boston published a series of experiments Thursday showing that synthetic biological signals can quickly reprogram ordinary skin cells into entities that appear virtually identical to embryonic stem cells. Moreover, the same strategy can then turn those cells into ones that could be used for transplants.
The cells produced by the Harvard team, known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells, would avoid that ethical objection and could in some ways be superior to embryonic stem cells. For example, iPS cells could enable scientists to take an easily obtainable skin cell from any patient and use it to create perfectly matched cells, tissue and potentially even entire organs for transplants that would be immune to rejection.
While cautioning that the work needs to be repeated elsewhere and explored further, other researchers said the technique appears to represent a major development in the promising field of "regenerative medicine," which aims to create treatments tailored to individual patients.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "'Major' stem cell development announced" by Valerie Richardson, The Washington Times 9/30/10
The findings were also hailed by opponents of embryonic stem cell research, who have long criticized the scientific and political communities for focusing on the use of embryos at the expense of other, less morally objectionable methods.
"I think this is a stunning development," said Dr. David Stevens, CEO of the Christian Medical and Dental Association. "People have been saying we have to use embryonic stem cells because we don't have an alternative. Well, now we have an alternative."
The research comes at a critical juncture in the embryonic stem cell debate. A federal judge put a hold on such research in August after ruling that the Obama administration had likely violated the law by using federal funding for research that involved the destruction of human embryos.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
For background, read Embryonic Stem Cells Fail Where Other Research Advances
UPDATE 4/5/16: Stem Cell Breakthrough Means Embryos Needn't Be Killed
-- From "Cell technique works without embryos" by Rob Stein, Washington Post Staff Writer 10/1/10
A team of researchers at the Harvard Stem Cell Institute in Boston published a series of experiments Thursday showing that synthetic biological signals can quickly reprogram ordinary skin cells into entities that appear virtually identical to embryonic stem cells. Moreover, the same strategy can then turn those cells into ones that could be used for transplants.
The cells produced by the Harvard team, known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells, would avoid that ethical objection and could in some ways be superior to embryonic stem cells. For example, iPS cells could enable scientists to take an easily obtainable skin cell from any patient and use it to create perfectly matched cells, tissue and potentially even entire organs for transplants that would be immune to rejection.
While cautioning that the work needs to be repeated elsewhere and explored further, other researchers said the technique appears to represent a major development in the promising field of "regenerative medicine," which aims to create treatments tailored to individual patients.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "'Major' stem cell development announced" by Valerie Richardson, The Washington Times 9/30/10
The findings were also hailed by opponents of embryonic stem cell research, who have long criticized the scientific and political communities for focusing on the use of embryos at the expense of other, less morally objectionable methods.
"I think this is a stunning development," said Dr. David Stevens, CEO of the Christian Medical and Dental Association. "People have been saying we have to use embryonic stem cells because we don't have an alternative. Well, now we have an alternative."
The research comes at a critical juncture in the embryonic stem cell debate. A federal judge put a hold on such research in August after ruling that the Obama administration had likely violated the law by using federal funding for research that involved the destruction of human embryos.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Labels:
bioethics,
health care,
physician,
scientist,
stem cell research,
unborn
God Stays in Capitol on a Technicality: Judge
U.S. District Judge William M. Conley in Madison, WI dismissed a lawsuit to remove mentions of The Almighty in the Capitol Visitor Center filed by the atheist Freedom From Religion Foundation due to a lack of legal standing to sue.
-- From "ACLJ 'Extremely Pleased' Federal Court Rejects Lawsuit Challenging National Motto and Pledge of Allegiance Displays at Capitol Visitor Center" posted at Sun Herald (Gulfport/Biloxi, MS) 9/30/10
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) . . . representing 50 members of Congress, filed an amicus brief in the case asking the court to reject the suit saying it "borders on frivolous" and serves no purpose other "than to waste judicial resources."
In an opinion issued yesterday by the U.S. District Court in Madison, Wisconsin, the court dismissed the suit and concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish standing in the case.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Federal Court Rejects Atheist Lawsuit Challenging National Motto and Pledge of Allegiance Displays at Capitol Visitor Center" by Pete Winn, CNSNews.com 10/1/10
The judge noted that under prior Supreme Court precedents, taxpayers can only bring legal challenges for perceived injuries if the injuries are directly tied to specific appropriations by Congress.
Conley did not rule on the merits of the legal challenge or whether the National Motto and Pledge were constitutional.
The Madison, Wis.-based Freedom From Religion Foundation will be re-filing the lawsuit, according to the group’s president, Annie Laurie Gaylor.
“We did not lose on the merits, it’s procedural. And the merits we want to address, because the administration did write a brief on the merits and it’s just full of distorted history and the distorted perception of the separation of church and state that is required by our Constitution.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "ACLJ 'Extremely Pleased' Federal Court Rejects Lawsuit Challenging National Motto and Pledge of Allegiance Displays at Capitol Visitor Center" posted at Sun Herald (Gulfport/Biloxi, MS) 9/30/10
The American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) . . . representing 50 members of Congress, filed an amicus brief in the case asking the court to reject the suit saying it "borders on frivolous" and serves no purpose other "than to waste judicial resources."
In an opinion issued yesterday by the U.S. District Court in Madison, Wisconsin, the court dismissed the suit and concluded that the plaintiffs failed to establish standing in the case.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Federal Court Rejects Atheist Lawsuit Challenging National Motto and Pledge of Allegiance Displays at Capitol Visitor Center" by Pete Winn, CNSNews.com 10/1/10
The judge noted that under prior Supreme Court precedents, taxpayers can only bring legal challenges for perceived injuries if the injuries are directly tied to specific appropriations by Congress.
Conley did not rule on the merits of the legal challenge or whether the National Motto and Pledge were constitutional.
The Madison, Wis.-based Freedom From Religion Foundation will be re-filing the lawsuit, according to the group’s president, Annie Laurie Gaylor.
“We did not lose on the merits, it’s procedural. And the merits we want to address, because the administration did write a brief on the merits and it’s just full of distorted history and the distorted perception of the separation of church and state that is required by our Constitution.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)