Catholic politicians who publicly support abortion or homosexual marriage and then seek to turn away from such “gravely sinful acts” must perform “public” actions of “repentance,” said Raymond Burke, the archbishop emeritus of St. Louis and the current head of the highest court at the Vatican, the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura.
UPDATE 3/14/13: Pope Francis I Says Wayward Politicians Can't Take Communion
UPDATE 10/20/10: Pope elevates Burke to cardinal
-- From "Vatican's Chief Justice: Catholic Politicians Who Support Abortion or Gay Marriage Must Publicly Repent" by Michael W. Chapman, CNSNews.com 10/18/10
In remarks at the 5th Human Life International World Prayer Congress for Life in Rome, Italy, Arbp. Burke said that the culture today pushes a “cafeteria Catholicism,” whereby some Catholics pick and choose “what part of the deposit of faith to believe and practice.” As a result, “there has developed in places a false notion that the Christian or any person of faith, in order to be a true citizen of his nation, must bracket his faith life from his public life.”
“We find self-professed Catholics, for example, who sustain and support the right of a woman to procure the death of the infant in her womb, or the right of two persons of the same sex to the recognition which the State gives to a man and a woman who have entered into marriage,” said the archbishop. “It is not possible to be a practicing Catholic and to conduct oneself publicly in this manner.”
Arbp. Burke also said that Catholics in public life “who persistently violate the moral law” on abortion and homosexual marriage “lead many into confusion and or even error,” which does the “gravest harm to our brother s and sisters and, therefore, to the whole nation.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Archbishop Burke laments effect of dissenting bishops, pro-abortion politicians" posted at CatholicCulture.org 10/15/10
“When a person has culpably espoused and cooperated in gravely sinful acts, leading many into error and confusion over fundamental questions regarding respect for life and integrity of marriage and family, his repentance of such actions must also be public,” Archbishop Burke added, referring to Catholic politicians who support abortion and same-sex marriage.
The “perennial discipline of the Church [has] prohibited the giving of Holy Communion or the granting of a Church funeral to those who persist after admonition in the grave violation of the moral law,” he noted. “It is said that these disciplines which the Church has consistently observed down the centuries presume to pass judgment on eternal judgment of a soul, a judgment that belongs to God alone, and therefore can be abandoned.”
“On the contrary, [such] public action[s] of the soul are in violation of the moral law, and do grave harm to all who are confused and led into error by these actions.”
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Click headlines below for previous articles:
Vatican Stakes Position in U.S. Elections
Catholics Who Voted for Obama Cooperated With Evil
Archbishop Slams Obama For Anti-Life, Anti-Family Agenda
Cardinal Speaks Pro-life, whereas Catholic Scholars Support Obama
Faithful Priests Call on All Bishops to Back Archbishop Burke
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Monday, October 18, 2010
Pro-life Political Video Censored by YouTube
Television stations in the nation's capital must, by law, allow the television commercials District of Columbia congressional candidate Missy Smith is running to air. But the Internet is another story and the popular video sharing web site YouTube has pulled them because they contain images of aborted babies.
To view a second video, go to the campaign website.
-- From "Graphic campaign ads are headed for local TVs -- but not YouTube" posted at The Washington Post 10/18/10
To the dismay of local Republicans, who are distancing themselves from their nominee, Smith has reportedly bought airtime on the local networks as she tries to unseat Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) in the overwhelmingly Democratic District.
Despite the ads' controversial and grotesque content, local television stations say they have no choice but to show them because of federal regulations.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "YouTube Pulls Graphic Abortion Ads Congressional Candidate Running on TV" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/18/10
YouTube is no stranger to removing pro-life videos, and has cut out others featuring graphic images and those pertaining to undercover investigations of Planned Parenthood.
YouTube posted a message on the page previously containing the Smith advertisement, saying the video "has been disabled for violation of the YouTube Community Guidelines."
The notice warns the user who posted the video that a strike against the account has been posted that will be removed in six months. Additional strikes could result in disabling the YouTube account altogether.
The ads present a unique opportunity to show the graphic images of babies killed by abortion on national media, she said. In opposition to the usual media "blackout" regarding the babies, the laws regulating campaign ads allow for the candidate to show the graphic images.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
To view a second video, go to the campaign website.
-- From "Graphic campaign ads are headed for local TVs -- but not YouTube" posted at The Washington Post 10/18/10
To the dismay of local Republicans, who are distancing themselves from their nominee, Smith has reportedly bought airtime on the local networks as she tries to unseat Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D) in the overwhelmingly Democratic District.
Despite the ads' controversial and grotesque content, local television stations say they have no choice but to show them because of federal regulations.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "YouTube Pulls Graphic Abortion Ads Congressional Candidate Running on TV" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/18/10
YouTube is no stranger to removing pro-life videos, and has cut out others featuring graphic images and those pertaining to undercover investigations of Planned Parenthood.
YouTube posted a message on the page previously containing the Smith advertisement, saying the video "has been disabled for violation of the YouTube Community Guidelines."
The notice warns the user who posted the video that a strike against the account has been posted that will be removed in six months. Additional strikes could result in disabling the YouTube account altogether.
The ads present a unique opportunity to show the graphic images of babies killed by abortion on national media, she said. In opposition to the usual media "blackout" regarding the babies, the laws regulating campaign ads allow for the candidate to show the graphic images.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Ruling Class, Media Morally Ignorant
While the liberal media try to sink conservative candidates by painting them as "anti-gay" and "anti-abortion," and the GOP establishment is scared to touch social/conservative issues, polls show that Americans flood support toward pro-family/pro-life candidates.
-- From "US parties try to play down social issues, but gay marriage debate flares in some contests" by David Crary, Associated Press 10/17/10
In Minnesota, New Hampshire, California and New York, gubernatorial campaigns have become battlegrounds for rival sides in the debate, with the Democratic candidates supporting same-sex marriage and the Republicans opposed.
In Iowa, voters will decide whether to oust three state Supreme Court justices who joined last year's unanimous decision making the state one of five where gay marriage is legal.
And in Rhode Island and California, Democratic candidates are seeking to become the fourth and fifth openly gay members of Congress. The Californian, Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet, has a husband and 4-year-old twins, and would be Congress' first openly gay parent.
Republicans have not emphasized social issues as much as in recent elections, calculating that dismay over the economy and frustration with the Democratic agenda will be enough to post big gains. The Republicans' recent "Pledge to America" did not call for a federal ban on gay marriage or broach the issue of gays in the military.
. . . Click here to read the entire article, detailing the candidate positions on these issues in several states.
-- From "US parties try to play down social issues, but gay marriage debate flares in some contests" by David Crary, Associated Press 10/17/10
In Minnesota, New Hampshire, California and New York, gubernatorial campaigns have become battlegrounds for rival sides in the debate, with the Democratic candidates supporting same-sex marriage and the Republicans opposed.
In Iowa, voters will decide whether to oust three state Supreme Court justices who joined last year's unanimous decision making the state one of five where gay marriage is legal.
And in Rhode Island and California, Democratic candidates are seeking to become the fourth and fifth openly gay members of Congress. The Californian, Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet, has a husband and 4-year-old twins, and would be Congress' first openly gay parent.
Republicans have not emphasized social issues as much as in recent elections, calculating that dismay over the economy and frustration with the Democratic agenda will be enough to post big gains. The Republicans' recent "Pledge to America" did not call for a federal ban on gay marriage or broach the issue of gays in the military.
. . . Click here to read the entire article, detailing the candidate positions on these issues in several states.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
White House Reluctantly Supports Marriage
The Obama Justice Department on Tuesday filed a terse notice to a federal appeals court in Boston that it is appealing a U.S. district judge’s ruling striking down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act [DOMA].
For extensive background, see series of past linked articles.
UPDATE 5/31/12: 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston rules against DOMA -- next stop, U.S. Supreme Court
-- From "Obama administration appeals gay marriage ruling" by Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters 10/12/10
"As a policy matter, the President has made clear that he believes DOMA is discriminatory and should be repealed," said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler. "The Justice Department is defending the statute, as it traditionally does when acts of Congress are challenged."
The rulings being appealed by the government were made in July by U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in Boston who found the law violated the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment, which protects states' rights, and the clause granting equal protection under the law.
Under his rulings, same-sex couples would be entitled to the same federal spousal benefits and protections that are afforded to heterosexual married couples.
The appeal comes at a tough time for Obama, who has been trying to shore up his liberal base ahead of the contentious congressional elections when his fellow Democrats are expected to lose many seats to Republicans. Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Feds appeal Mass. rulings against US marriage law" by Denise Lavoie, Associated Press Legal Affairs Writer 10/12/10
The notice of appeal filed Tuesday did not spell out any arguments in support of the law. The appeals eventually will be heard by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.
Opponents of gay marriage, citing the president's support for repealing DOMA, have accused the Obama administration of failing to vigorously defend the law.
In two separate cases, U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in July ruled the federal Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, is unconstitutional because it interferes with a state's right to define marriage and denies married gay couples an array of federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.
Tauro's rulings came in separate challenges: one filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley and the other by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, a Boston-based legal rights group that argued successfully to make Massachusetts the first state in the country to legalize gay marriage.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Obama Justice Department Appeals DOMA Rulings" by Peter J. Smith, LifeSiteNews.com 10/13/10
. . . Tracy Schmaler, the DOJ’s spokeswoman [said] in a statement . . . "The Department of Justice has a long-standing practice of defending federal statutes when they are challenged in court, including by appealing adverse decisions of lower courts."
However, both defenders and opponents of DOMA point out that not all U.S. administrations have defended federal laws they disagreed with or thought were unconstitutional.
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley sued in the Massachusetts case, and the [Nancy] Gill case [an employee of the U.S. Postal Service, with "wife" Marcelle Letourneau] was brought forward by the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD).
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
For extensive background, see series of past linked articles.
UPDATE 5/31/12: 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston rules against DOMA -- next stop, U.S. Supreme Court
-- From "Obama administration appeals gay marriage ruling" by Jeremy Pelofsky, Reuters 10/12/10
"As a policy matter, the President has made clear that he believes DOMA is discriminatory and should be repealed," said Justice Department spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler. "The Justice Department is defending the statute, as it traditionally does when acts of Congress are challenged."
The rulings being appealed by the government were made in July by U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in Boston who found the law violated the U.S. Constitution's 10th Amendment, which protects states' rights, and the clause granting equal protection under the law.
Under his rulings, same-sex couples would be entitled to the same federal spousal benefits and protections that are afforded to heterosexual married couples.
The appeal comes at a tough time for Obama, who has been trying to shore up his liberal base ahead of the contentious congressional elections when his fellow Democrats are expected to lose many seats to Republicans. Democrats could lose control of the House of Representatives.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Feds appeal Mass. rulings against US marriage law" by Denise Lavoie, Associated Press Legal Affairs Writer 10/12/10
The notice of appeal filed Tuesday did not spell out any arguments in support of the law. The appeals eventually will be heard by the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston.
Opponents of gay marriage, citing the president's support for repealing DOMA, have accused the Obama administration of failing to vigorously defend the law.
In two separate cases, U.S. District Judge Joseph Tauro in July ruled the federal Defense of Marriage Act, known as DOMA, is unconstitutional because it interferes with a state's right to define marriage and denies married gay couples an array of federal benefits given to heterosexual married couples, including the ability to file joint tax returns.
Tauro's rulings came in separate challenges: one filed by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley and the other by Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, a Boston-based legal rights group that argued successfully to make Massachusetts the first state in the country to legalize gay marriage.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Obama Justice Department Appeals DOMA Rulings" by Peter J. Smith, LifeSiteNews.com 10/13/10
. . . Tracy Schmaler, the DOJ’s spokeswoman [said] in a statement . . . "The Department of Justice has a long-standing practice of defending federal statutes when they are challenged in court, including by appealing adverse decisions of lower courts."
However, both defenders and opponents of DOMA point out that not all U.S. administrations have defended federal laws they disagreed with or thought were unconstitutional.
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley sued in the Massachusetts case, and the [Nancy] Gill case [an employee of the U.S. Postal Service, with "wife" Marcelle Letourneau] was brought forward by the Gay and Lesbian Advocates and Defenders (GLAD).
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Christian Principal Disciplined for Non-School Prayer
A California elementary school principal given disciplinary action for appearing in a promotional for a teachers prayer breakfast is suing, claiming he did “absolutely nothing wrong,” lawyers said.
-- From "Principal sues Goleta district over prayer video" by The Associated Press 10/12/2010
An attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Craig Richter, a principal at Foothill School in the Goleta Union School District [Santa Barbara].
The suit seeks an injunction preventing the district from firing him, and attorney's fees.
It says the district prevented Richter and teachers from taking part in the event for practical reasons because they would miss school time, but gave no indication that it objected on grounds of promoting religion.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Calif. Principal Disciplined for Endorsing Prayer Breakfast" by Stephanie Samuel, Christian Post Correspondent 10/16/10
Craig Richter, principal of FootHill School and a Christian, appeared in a short video promoting the Santa Barbara Community Prayer Breakfast, which was organized to honor educators. A member of his school district, Goleta Union, viewed the video on Youtube and the district later deemed that Richter had violated the separation of church and state, threatened to end his contract and placed him on a disciplinary performance plan.
In the 30-second video, Richter spoke mostly about the teaching profession. He thanked breakfast attendees saying, “For educators to be acknowledged and prayed for is both an encouragement and a great honor. Your support of the community prayer breakfast is appreciated.”
[Richter's attorney, William] Rehwald contended that Richter’s advertising the prayer breakfast was done as a private citizen speaking on an issue of public concern and the district violated his constitutional right to freedom to speech.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Principal sues Goleta district over prayer video" by The Associated Press 10/12/2010
An attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund filed the lawsuit in federal court on behalf of Craig Richter, a principal at Foothill School in the Goleta Union School District [Santa Barbara].
The suit seeks an injunction preventing the district from firing him, and attorney's fees.
It says the district prevented Richter and teachers from taking part in the event for practical reasons because they would miss school time, but gave no indication that it objected on grounds of promoting religion.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Calif. Principal Disciplined for Endorsing Prayer Breakfast" by Stephanie Samuel, Christian Post Correspondent 10/16/10
Craig Richter, principal of FootHill School and a Christian, appeared in a short video promoting the Santa Barbara Community Prayer Breakfast, which was organized to honor educators. A member of his school district, Goleta Union, viewed the video on Youtube and the district later deemed that Richter had violated the separation of church and state, threatened to end his contract and placed him on a disciplinary performance plan.
In the 30-second video, Richter spoke mostly about the teaching profession. He thanked breakfast attendees saying, “For educators to be acknowledged and prayed for is both an encouragement and a great honor. Your support of the community prayer breakfast is appreciated.”
[Richter's attorney, William] Rehwald contended that Richter’s advertising the prayer breakfast was done as a private citizen speaking on an issue of public concern and the district violated his constitutional right to freedom to speech.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
D.C. Middle School 'Sex Test' Riles Parents
Going on defense, D.C. Public Schools responded in a statement saying it was "an assessment used to determine the students’ baseline knowledge and to responsibly assure that students get all of the information and skills they need to protect themselves."
The statement did not explain the thinking behind a "pre-test" administered to 12-year-olds referred to sexual organs and activities, so-called "dental dams," drug use during sex, and transgenderism.
To see the "sex test" PDF, click here.
-- From "Sex Survey at D.C. School Sparks Controversy" posted at FoxNews.com 10/15/10
A Washington, D.C., middle school is under fire after distributing a survey to seventh-graders asking both boys and girls about their sexual orientations and whether they knew how to put on a condom, among other sex-based questions.
The survey, developed by Metro TeenAIDS, a group dedicated to helping young people fight against HIV/AIDS, was intended to raise awareness of sexually transmitted diseases and teach the children how to avoid them, MyFoxDC.com reported.
The students were asked their genders -- whether male, female or transgender. And they were asked to identify themselves as straight, bisexual, gay or lesbian or "not sure."
Other questions included: How sure are you that you know the difference between oral, vaginal, and anal sex? Would know where to get condoms if/when you or a friend needed them? Can correctly put a condom on yourself or your partner?
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "VIDEO: DCPS, Metro TeenAIDS respond to Hardy Middle School 'sex test' uproar as Rhee resigns" by Katie Manning, The Georgetown Dish 10/13/10
The DCPS statement defended the sex education program at Hardy, but not the failure to get informed consent from parents for their children's participation in both the test and the program. "Both the 'Making Proud Choices!' and DCPS health curriculum of which it is a part are in-line with the DC Health Learning Standards as well as the National Health Education Standards," the DCPS statement said.
"Unfortunately," DCPS said, "the opt-out letter to parents regarding this unit in the health class went home on the same day that the assessment was administered. As a result, there was not enough time to allow for parental response before the unit began."
"We strongly believe that parents have a role to play in providing HIV/AIDS and reproductive health education, and we regret that our oversight resulted in affecting our parents’ right to choose how their students receive this information," DCPS said.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Parents vs. ‘Public Health’" by L. Brent Bozell III, CNSNews.com 10/15/10
. . . Parents at Hardy Middle School in the affluent Glover Park neighborhood in Washington, D.C., were shocked to discover that a sex-and-drug-use survey had been distributed to 12-year-olds in their physical education classes without any warnings or consent forms sent to parents.
The first words the children read were these: “This questionnaire asks you about sex and drugs (like cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, ecstasy, and marijuana).” Of course, they promised, “Your answers will not be told to anyone in your school or family.”
. . . The very first question was “What is your gender?” Two possibilities, you think? Try four boxes: Male and female, plus – “transgender (M to F)” and “transgender (F to M).”
Welcome to the nation’s capital, where the D.C. Public Schools signed a contract with the activist group Metro TeenAIDS to engage in what they call “capacity building” to fight the spread of HIV and AIDS. They enter schools hoping to empower each child to “develop and practice life skills that he/she might not have otherwise learned.” (You can be sure they are succeeding!) The survey and the program are titled “Making Proud Choices!” It’s funded by the federal government – to be specific, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
To read the entire column above, CLICK HERE.
The statement did not explain the thinking behind a "pre-test" administered to 12-year-olds referred to sexual organs and activities, so-called "dental dams," drug use during sex, and transgenderism.
To see the "sex test" PDF, click here.
-- From "Sex Survey at D.C. School Sparks Controversy" posted at FoxNews.com 10/15/10
A Washington, D.C., middle school is under fire after distributing a survey to seventh-graders asking both boys and girls about their sexual orientations and whether they knew how to put on a condom, among other sex-based questions.
The survey, developed by Metro TeenAIDS, a group dedicated to helping young people fight against HIV/AIDS, was intended to raise awareness of sexually transmitted diseases and teach the children how to avoid them, MyFoxDC.com reported.
The students were asked their genders -- whether male, female or transgender. And they were asked to identify themselves as straight, bisexual, gay or lesbian or "not sure."
Other questions included: How sure are you that you know the difference between oral, vaginal, and anal sex? Would know where to get condoms if/when you or a friend needed them? Can correctly put a condom on yourself or your partner?
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "VIDEO: DCPS, Metro TeenAIDS respond to Hardy Middle School 'sex test' uproar as Rhee resigns" by Katie Manning, The Georgetown Dish 10/13/10
The DCPS statement defended the sex education program at Hardy, but not the failure to get informed consent from parents for their children's participation in both the test and the program. "Both the 'Making Proud Choices!' and DCPS health curriculum of which it is a part are in-line with the DC Health Learning Standards as well as the National Health Education Standards," the DCPS statement said.
"Unfortunately," DCPS said, "the opt-out letter to parents regarding this unit in the health class went home on the same day that the assessment was administered. As a result, there was not enough time to allow for parental response before the unit began."
"We strongly believe that parents have a role to play in providing HIV/AIDS and reproductive health education, and we regret that our oversight resulted in affecting our parents’ right to choose how their students receive this information," DCPS said.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Parents vs. ‘Public Health’" by L. Brent Bozell III, CNSNews.com 10/15/10
. . . Parents at Hardy Middle School in the affluent Glover Park neighborhood in Washington, D.C., were shocked to discover that a sex-and-drug-use survey had been distributed to 12-year-olds in their physical education classes without any warnings or consent forms sent to parents.
The first words the children read were these: “This questionnaire asks you about sex and drugs (like cigarettes, alcohol, marijuana, ecstasy, and marijuana).” Of course, they promised, “Your answers will not be told to anyone in your school or family.”
. . . The very first question was “What is your gender?” Two possibilities, you think? Try four boxes: Male and female, plus – “transgender (M to F)” and “transgender (F to M).”
Welcome to the nation’s capital, where the D.C. Public Schools signed a contract with the activist group Metro TeenAIDS to engage in what they call “capacity building” to fight the spread of HIV and AIDS. They enter schools hoping to empower each child to “develop and practice life skills that he/she might not have otherwise learned.” (You can be sure they are succeeding!) The survey and the program are titled “Making Proud Choices!” It’s funded by the federal government – to be specific, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).
To read the entire column above, CLICK HERE.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Abortion Limits Nationwide? New Fetal Pain Law
A new fetal pain law is taking effect . . . in Nebraska that targets late-term abortions based on the pain an unborn baby will likely feel during the abortion procedure. The law could set a national trend of other states and Congress considering such measures and could lead to a Supreme Court battle.
-- From "Nebraska abortion law may spread" by Martha Stoddard, Omaha World-Herald Bureau 10/15/10
Nebraska's one-of-a-kind law banning almost all abortions after a fetus reaches 20 weeks might not stand alone for long.
Abortion opponents say they expect lawmakers in several states to introduce similar proposals next session.
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, based in Des Moines and serving Omaha, Lincoln and Iowa, said it plans no challenge to the new law.
This summer, Planned Parenthood successfully sued to stop implementation of a second Nebraska abortion law.
That measure would have required extensive screening of women seeking abortions and held doctors civilly responsible if a screening fell short.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Fetal Pain Abortion Law Takes Effect in Nebraska, Could Set National Trend" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/15/10
The Nebraska law, Legislative Bill 1103, relies on significant medical research and expert testimony to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy on the basis that unborn children feel pain.
The legislation has been hailed by pro-life advocates across the country for its innovative approach and focusing the public's attention on unborn babies who have been medically documented as pain capable at 20 weeks gestation.
The expected opposition -- in the form of lawsuits from pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood or the Center for Reproductive Rights, have yet to materialize.
Mary Spaulding Balch, a pro-life attorney who is the state legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, says abortion advocates may not want to have a national discussion on the pain unborn children feel because it draws attention to their humanity and need for legal protection.
When looking at abortion case law, NRLC says it hopes a new analysis can be established that would ultimately lead to overturning Roe.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Nebraska abortion law may spread" by Martha Stoddard, Omaha World-Herald Bureau 10/15/10
Nebraska's one-of-a-kind law banning almost all abortions after a fetus reaches 20 weeks might not stand alone for long.
Abortion opponents say they expect lawmakers in several states to introduce similar proposals next session.
Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, based in Des Moines and serving Omaha, Lincoln and Iowa, said it plans no challenge to the new law.
This summer, Planned Parenthood successfully sued to stop implementation of a second Nebraska abortion law.
That measure would have required extensive screening of women seeking abortions and held doctors civilly responsible if a screening fell short.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Fetal Pain Abortion Law Takes Effect in Nebraska, Could Set National Trend" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/15/10
The Nebraska law, Legislative Bill 1103, relies on significant medical research and expert testimony to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy on the basis that unborn children feel pain.
The legislation has been hailed by pro-life advocates across the country for its innovative approach and focusing the public's attention on unborn babies who have been medically documented as pain capable at 20 weeks gestation.
The expected opposition -- in the form of lawsuits from pro-abortion groups like Planned Parenthood or the Center for Reproductive Rights, have yet to materialize.
Mary Spaulding Balch, a pro-life attorney who is the state legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee, says abortion advocates may not want to have a national discussion on the pain unborn children feel because it draws attention to their humanity and need for legal protection.
When looking at abortion case law, NRLC says it hopes a new analysis can be established that would ultimately lead to overturning Roe.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
White House Apologizes for Denial of 'Gay Gene'
White House Senior Adviser Valerie Jarrett apologized Thursday morning for referring to a gay teen [Justin Aaberg of Minnesota] who committed suicide as having made a “lifestyle choice.”
-- From "Valerie Jarrett apologizes for remark about gay teen" by Abby Phillip, Politico 10/14/10
“These [parents] are good people. They were aware that their son was gay; they embraced him, they loved him, they supported his lifestyle choice,” Jarrett [said]. “But when he left the home and went to school, he was tortured by his classmates.”
“I meant no disrespect to the LGBT community, and I apologize to any who have taken offense at my poor choice of words,” Jarrett said [later via E-mail]. “Sexual orientation and gender identity are not a choice, and anyone who knows me and my work over the years knows that I am a firm believer and supporter in the rights of LGBT Americans.”
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Valerie Jarrett apologizes for remark about gay teen" by Abby Phillip, Politico 10/14/10
“These [parents] are good people. They were aware that their son was gay; they embraced him, they loved him, they supported his lifestyle choice,” Jarrett [said]. “But when he left the home and went to school, he was tortured by his classmates.”
“I meant no disrespect to the LGBT community, and I apologize to any who have taken offense at my poor choice of words,” Jarrett said [later via E-mail]. “Sexual orientation and gender identity are not a choice, and anyone who knows me and my work over the years knows that I am a firm believer and supporter in the rights of LGBT Americans.”
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Africans in D.C. Praying for American Revival
African Christians recognize that The Church in America is failing Christ, and so their missionary effort is focusing on the United States, to once again, be that "City upon a hill."
-- From "African network praying for America's spiritual awakening" by Michael Carl © 2010 WorldNetDaily 10/16/10
Pastors and church members are taking to the West Washington Mall [today] to pray that God will send a spiritual awakening to America in an event organized by the African Strategic Leadership Prayer Network, and up to 50,000 people are expected.
Pastor Michael Obi is one of the organizers and he says it's important to pray right now.
"The purpose of the timing has a lot to do with the spiritual climate of the nation. We also realize that for decades, God has used America to bring light and the Gospel to Africa. America has been used greatly." Obi explained.
Event partner Awakening America Alliance Chairman Billy Wilson says the event is targeted at those who call themselves Christian in the American church.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "African Christians to Pray for U.S. Revival" by Adrienne S. Gaines, Charisma News 10/11/10
. . . Bishop Darlingston Johnson, a native of Liberia who now leads Bethany World Outreach Church in Washington, D.C., and heads the ASLPN . . . worries that the U.S. is reaching a dangerous point where "evil" such as homosexuality and abortion is being called good. "Unless by the grace of God we can turn the tide and God can give America a Christ awakening, unfortunately this country is going to face judgment."
In addition to bringing a spiritual awakening, Johnson also hopes the event sends a message. Although the U.S. is often criticized abroad, he said, "There are people, immigrants, who love this country and who desire America to continue to be strong, continue to be prosperous, continue to be Christian."
Pastor Michael Obi [said,] "We believe God will grant us that mercy, and we'll see a drastic change in the policy of the nation from the head or from some kind of direction, a shift," he said. Without that shift, he believes God will allow circumstances to occur that could push the nation toward repentance.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "African network praying for America's spiritual awakening" by Michael Carl © 2010 WorldNetDaily 10/16/10
Pastors and church members are taking to the West Washington Mall [today] to pray that God will send a spiritual awakening to America in an event organized by the African Strategic Leadership Prayer Network, and up to 50,000 people are expected.
Pastor Michael Obi is one of the organizers and he says it's important to pray right now.
"The purpose of the timing has a lot to do with the spiritual climate of the nation. We also realize that for decades, God has used America to bring light and the Gospel to Africa. America has been used greatly." Obi explained.
Event partner Awakening America Alliance Chairman Billy Wilson says the event is targeted at those who call themselves Christian in the American church.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "African Christians to Pray for U.S. Revival" by Adrienne S. Gaines, Charisma News 10/11/10
. . . Bishop Darlingston Johnson, a native of Liberia who now leads Bethany World Outreach Church in Washington, D.C., and heads the ASLPN . . . worries that the U.S. is reaching a dangerous point where "evil" such as homosexuality and abortion is being called good. "Unless by the grace of God we can turn the tide and God can give America a Christ awakening, unfortunately this country is going to face judgment."
In addition to bringing a spiritual awakening, Johnson also hopes the event sends a message. Although the U.S. is often criticized abroad, he said, "There are people, immigrants, who love this country and who desire America to continue to be strong, continue to be prosperous, continue to be Christian."
Pastor Michael Obi [said,] "We believe God will grant us that mercy, and we'll see a drastic change in the policy of the nation from the head or from some kind of direction, a shift," he said. Without that shift, he believes God will allow circumstances to occur that could push the nation toward repentance.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Court Puts Silence (Prayer) in IL Schools
Saying there is no harm in silence, a federal appeals court in Chicago on Friday revived a dormant state law that requires a moment of "silent prayer or silent reflection" to start the day at every public school.
UPDATE 10/3/11: Atheist Rob Sherman loses as U.S. Supreme Court allows prayer law to stand
UPDATE 1/14/11: Illinois schools resume "Silent Reflection and Student Prayer"
-- From "Court finds moment of silence law constitutional" by The Associated Press 10/15/10
In its ruling Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled legislators who supported the bill said the moment of reflection had a secular and practical purpose in settling down students at the start of the school day.
The ruling came in a lawsuit designed to bar schools from enforcing the Illinois Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act. It was filed by talk show host Rob Sherman, an outspoken atheist, and his daughter, Dawn, a student at [District 214] Buffalo Grove High School in suburban Chicago.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois' 'moment of silence' law upheld" by Tara Malone and Andy Grimm, Chicago Tribune reporters 10/15/10
The court upheld the law because it does not specify that the silent time be used for prayer, and because legislators who supported the bill said the moment of reflection had both a secular and practical purpose in settling down students at the start of the day.
A spokeswoman for Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office, which defended the measure, welcomed the ruling, saying it "upholds the legislature's action in voting overwhelmingly to pass this law."
The case now returns to U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman, paving the way for Illinois public schools to once again provide a moment for students to silently reflect or pray on the "anticipated activities of the day."
On Friday, Dawn Sherman, now a 17-year-old senior, and her father vowed to appeal.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 10/3/11: Atheist Rob Sherman loses as U.S. Supreme Court allows prayer law to stand
UPDATE 1/14/11: Illinois schools resume "Silent Reflection and Student Prayer"
-- From "Court finds moment of silence law constitutional" by The Associated Press 10/15/10
In its ruling Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled legislators who supported the bill said the moment of reflection had a secular and practical purpose in settling down students at the start of the school day.
The ruling came in a lawsuit designed to bar schools from enforcing the Illinois Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act. It was filed by talk show host Rob Sherman, an outspoken atheist, and his daughter, Dawn, a student at [District 214] Buffalo Grove High School in suburban Chicago.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois' 'moment of silence' law upheld" by Tara Malone and Andy Grimm, Chicago Tribune reporters 10/15/10
The court upheld the law because it does not specify that the silent time be used for prayer, and because legislators who supported the bill said the moment of reflection had both a secular and practical purpose in settling down students at the start of the day.
A spokeswoman for Attorney General Lisa Madigan's office, which defended the measure, welcomed the ruling, saying it "upholds the legislature's action in voting overwhelmingly to pass this law."
The case now returns to U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman, paving the way for Illinois public schools to once again provide a moment for students to silently reflect or pray on the "anticipated activities of the day."
On Friday, Dawn Sherman, now a 17-year-old senior, and her father vowed to appeal.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Mass. Votes to Bare Breasts
November 2nd, Massachusetts voters of the Third Berkshire District will consider a nonbinding question to change the legal definition of nudity to allow women to wear nothing but bikini bottoms in public.
UPDATE 11/4/10: Voters choose to keep their shirts on - nonbinding question fails
-- From "A twist on equality laws" by Brian MacQuarrie, Boston Globe Staff 10/15/10
Public nudity has caused controversy elsewhere in New England. While the state of Vermont permits the [topless] practice so long as it does not include lewdness, such as flashing, town officials in Brattleboro voted to ban public nudity in 2007. The decision was reached after a small group of young people began to gather downtown in the buff in 2006 because no local or state ordinance prohibited nudity. After out-of-state visitors began arriving to glimpse the scene, and at least one tourist strolled through downtown without clothing, town officials put a stop to it.
Under Massachusetts law, running afoul of the state’s definition of nudity is considered indecent exposure . . .
The ballot question, if approved, would ask the district’s state representative to support legislation — not yet introduced — to amend the nudity definition, “so that no part of the female breast is included.’’
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Vote against nudity double standard" Letter to the Editor by Katherine Gundelfinger (author of ballot question) 10/03/2010
We need to end the double standards in Massachusetts' nudity law. There should be parity and equality, but there is not. It should be the purpose of the law to recognize equal treatment as fundamental. Instead women are penalized and an equality liberty withheld; the freedom to walk, swim and sun without shirts, because of body shape.
This double standard is also unfair to teenagers. Right now, if a teen boy receives and shares an e-mail from a girl showing her own breast in a photo, he may be charged with possession of child pornography. But if a teen girl forwards an e-mail of a boy showing his breast, she faces no such consequence. Girls should have the same freedom to remove their shirts for the sun or for the camera without reproach. Instead, girls are made to feel dirty and immoral to expose the very same part of their bodies that boys do. This is not equal and it is not right. Equal treatment means the right to act equally, to play equally, and to dress equally, regardless of body shape.
Women walking publicly without shirts should be as acceptable as men walking this way. It should be as acceptable as women holding positions in all areas of the workplace, including the military. This fight is fundamentally about holding men and women as equals. People may react against equality, as did Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 "stand in the schoolhouse door" to stop racially integrated schools. But today, there is no one who would stand for segregation would even remotely be taken seriously .
To read the entire letter above, CLICK HERE.
UPDATE 11/4/10: Voters choose to keep their shirts on - nonbinding question fails
-- From "A twist on equality laws" by Brian MacQuarrie, Boston Globe Staff 10/15/10
Public nudity has caused controversy elsewhere in New England. While the state of Vermont permits the [topless] practice so long as it does not include lewdness, such as flashing, town officials in Brattleboro voted to ban public nudity in 2007. The decision was reached after a small group of young people began to gather downtown in the buff in 2006 because no local or state ordinance prohibited nudity. After out-of-state visitors began arriving to glimpse the scene, and at least one tourist strolled through downtown without clothing, town officials put a stop to it.
Under Massachusetts law, running afoul of the state’s definition of nudity is considered indecent exposure . . .
The ballot question, if approved, would ask the district’s state representative to support legislation — not yet introduced — to amend the nudity definition, “so that no part of the female breast is included.’’
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Vote against nudity double standard" Letter to the Editor by Katherine Gundelfinger (author of ballot question) 10/03/2010
We need to end the double standards in Massachusetts' nudity law. There should be parity and equality, but there is not. It should be the purpose of the law to recognize equal treatment as fundamental. Instead women are penalized and an equality liberty withheld; the freedom to walk, swim and sun without shirts, because of body shape.
This double standard is also unfair to teenagers. Right now, if a teen boy receives and shares an e-mail from a girl showing her own breast in a photo, he may be charged with possession of child pornography. But if a teen girl forwards an e-mail of a boy showing his breast, she faces no such consequence. Girls should have the same freedom to remove their shirts for the sun or for the camera without reproach. Instead, girls are made to feel dirty and immoral to expose the very same part of their bodies that boys do. This is not equal and it is not right. Equal treatment means the right to act equally, to play equally, and to dress equally, regardless of body shape.
Women walking publicly without shirts should be as acceptable as men walking this way. It should be as acceptable as women holding positions in all areas of the workplace, including the military. This fight is fundamentally about holding men and women as equals. People may react against equality, as did Gov. George Wallace in his 1963 "stand in the schoolhouse door" to stop racially integrated schools. But today, there is no one who would stand for segregation would even remotely be taken seriously .
To read the entire letter above, CLICK HERE.
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Christian Schools' Textbooks Inferior: Supreme Court
On Tuesday, the United States Supreme Court rejected the appeal of the Association of Christian Schools International who had sued the University of California when it refused to accept the high school credits of students in history, science, literature classes based on the standard curricula used in the Association's 800 schools.
". . . religious speech in religious schools is less protected than commercial speech, flag burning and pornography."
-- From "Christian schools denied appeal in credit-for-religion case" by Dianna Narciso, Examiner 10/13/10
The University of California objected to the credit as the courses did not meet their standards. In history classes, for example, students at the Association's schools were told the Bible is "the 'unerring source for analysis' of past events," according to one of the experts who testified against the association in the original 2008 lawsuit.
Several expert witnesses testified then that the Association's standards were woefully unacceptable and it was not surprising that the University of California prevailed. But the Association cried foul, claiming their students were being discriminated against because of their religious beliefs.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Christian schools lose appeal bid in UC case" by Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer 10/13/10
The justices, without comment, denied a hearing to the Association of Christian Schools International . . .
UC requires certain high school courses for admission and says it reviews their content to make sure they cover subjects that incoming students need. University officials said some of the Christian schools' classes in biology, history, English and religion didn't pass the test - a conclusion that the schools blamed on discrimination.
The association's 800 high schools in California teach "standard course content" and "add a religious viewpoint in each subject ... as an integral part of their reason for existence," the group's lawyers said in their Supreme Court appeal.
. . . the university had rational grounds for denying college preparatory credit for the courses, U.S. District Judge James Otero said in a 2008 ruling.
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld his decision in January. A three-judge panel said the evidence showed that UC has approved other high school courses with "religious content and viewpoints," and classes that used religious textbooks, as long as they met academic standards.
The case is Association of Christian Schools International vs. Stearns, 09-1461.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
". . . religious speech in religious schools is less protected than commercial speech, flag burning and pornography."
-- From "Christian schools denied appeal in credit-for-religion case" by Dianna Narciso, Examiner 10/13/10
The University of California objected to the credit as the courses did not meet their standards. In history classes, for example, students at the Association's schools were told the Bible is "the 'unerring source for analysis' of past events," according to one of the experts who testified against the association in the original 2008 lawsuit.
Several expert witnesses testified then that the Association's standards were woefully unacceptable and it was not surprising that the University of California prevailed. But the Association cried foul, claiming their students were being discriminated against because of their religious beliefs.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Christian schools lose appeal bid in UC case" by Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle Staff Writer 10/13/10
The justices, without comment, denied a hearing to the Association of Christian Schools International . . .
UC requires certain high school courses for admission and says it reviews their content to make sure they cover subjects that incoming students need. University officials said some of the Christian schools' classes in biology, history, English and religion didn't pass the test - a conclusion that the schools blamed on discrimination.
The association's 800 high schools in California teach "standard course content" and "add a religious viewpoint in each subject ... as an integral part of their reason for existence," the group's lawyers said in their Supreme Court appeal.
. . . the university had rational grounds for denying college preparatory credit for the courses, U.S. District Judge James Otero said in a 2008 ruling.
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld his decision in January. A three-judge panel said the evidence showed that UC has approved other high school courses with "religious content and viewpoints," and classes that used religious textbooks, as long as they met academic standards.
The case is Association of Christian Schools International vs. Stearns, 09-1461.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
White House Prayers to 'The Spirits'
Adding to the discussion of the occult in politics (re: Christine O'Donnell says she is "not a witch"), Michelle Obama says that President Obama welcomes Americans' “prayer circles out there and people who want to keep the spirits clean around us.”
Read also, Is Obama Christian? Few Think So: Poll
and, Muslims, Atheists Obama's Political Base
-- From "Michelle Obama: Everybody is 'praying for us'" by Glenn Thrush & Kendra Marr, Politico 10/13/10
. . . the first lady made her political presence felt immediately Wednesday, delivering an impassioned and overtly religious pitch for Democrats to defend her husband’s legacy in the midterm elections.
“Everybody I know in our communities [is] praying for us,” she said, adopting a religious theme seldom used by her husband . . .
“Every day we feel that, and let me just tell your listeners, it means the world to us to know that there are prayer circles out there and people who want to keep the spirits clean around us,” she added.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Read also, Is Obama Christian? Few Think So: Poll
and, Muslims, Atheists Obama's Political Base
-- From "Michelle Obama: Everybody is 'praying for us'" by Glenn Thrush & Kendra Marr, Politico 10/13/10
. . . the first lady made her political presence felt immediately Wednesday, delivering an impassioned and overtly religious pitch for Democrats to defend her husband’s legacy in the midterm elections.
“Everybody I know in our communities [is] praying for us,” she said, adopting a religious theme seldom used by her husband . . .
“Every day we feel that, and let me just tell your listeners, it means the world to us to know that there are prayer circles out there and people who want to keep the spirits clean around us,” she added.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Christians Nationwide Urge Unseating Iowa Justices
Liberal "christians" and various homosexualists label the American Family Association as an “extremist hate group” fearing that such national Christian organizations will inform voters how to oust three Iowa Supreme Court justices who shoved same-sex "marriage" down Iowans' throats last year.
Also opposing the justices is an Iowa pastor who, like many others, is challenging the IRS to try to muzzle him.
UPDATE 11/3/10: Iowans Oust Gay Agenda Activist Justices
UPDATE 10/24/10: Voters split on expelling justices
-- From "Religious leaders urge Vander Plaats to denounce American Family Association" by Molly Rossiter, reporter for the Cedar Rapids Globe Gazette 10/13/10
Calling it an “extremist hate group” trying to manipulate votes by using fear, [pro-homosexual] religious leaders across the state Wednesday asked Bob Vander Plaats and his group, Iowa For Freedom, to denounce the American Family Association.
American Family Association, based in Tupelo, Miss., touts itself as “one of the largest and most effective pro-family organizations in the country” with a mission of motivating and equipping people to “restore American culture to its moral foundations.”
It is a major financial supporter of Vander Plaats’ Iowa For Freedom organization. The two organizations are leading a campaign to oust three Iowa Supreme Court justices because of the high court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Group Says Extremists Funding Attack On Iowa Courts" posted at KCCI TV8 Des Moines, IA 10/13/10
The [liberal] Interfaith Alliance said it's not trying to tell Iowans how to vote, but said voters should know the group behind the effort is the American Family Association. The Alliance calls them an out-of-state extremist group with a hate-filled agenda.
The group met on the same steps where Bob Vander Plaats launched the effort months ago to remove three justices from their seats. Vander Plaats calls on supporters to vote against Chief Justice Marsha Ternus, David Baker and Michael Streit, all up for retention vote on Nov 2.
The AFA paid for an advertising campaign and according to public records, has covered nearly $70,000 in expenses for Vander Plaats' group, Iowa for Freedom.
David Lane, a spokesman for AFA Action Inc., said the group has every right to get involved in a campaign in Iowa.
About $320,000 has been spent on the campaign to oust the judges. The National Organization for Marriage has spent $235,000 on TV ads.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Iowa pastor preaches politics to oust 3 justices who backed gay marriage" posted at USA Today 10/13/10
The Rev. Cary K. Gordon . . . an associate pastor at Cornerstone World Outreach in Sioux City, says he will defy federal law this month when he urges the congregation to vote to not retain the three justices, who participated in a unanimous ruling that allowed same-sex couples to wed. His mass mailing to 1,000 church leaders in September prompted one national religious liberty group to file a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service.
Advocates of the separation of church and state and some religious leaders say Gordon's plan is illegal, immoral and an attempt to falsely frame his dispute as a freedom-of-speech violation. The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State in Washington, D.C., called Gordon's actions one of the most outrageous attempts to politicize a church that he has ever seen.
Others, such as Jeff Mullen, senior pastor of Point of Grace Church in Waukee, are urging Iowa pastors to communicate to their congregations the "biblical mandate for involvement in local and national elections."
An IRS spokesman declined to comment.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Also opposing the justices is an Iowa pastor who, like many others, is challenging the IRS to try to muzzle him.
UPDATE 11/3/10: Iowans Oust Gay Agenda Activist Justices
UPDATE 10/24/10: Voters split on expelling justices
-- From "Religious leaders urge Vander Plaats to denounce American Family Association" by Molly Rossiter, reporter for the Cedar Rapids Globe Gazette 10/13/10
Calling it an “extremist hate group” trying to manipulate votes by using fear, [pro-homosexual] religious leaders across the state Wednesday asked Bob Vander Plaats and his group, Iowa For Freedom, to denounce the American Family Association.
American Family Association, based in Tupelo, Miss., touts itself as “one of the largest and most effective pro-family organizations in the country” with a mission of motivating and equipping people to “restore American culture to its moral foundations.”
It is a major financial supporter of Vander Plaats’ Iowa For Freedom organization. The two organizations are leading a campaign to oust three Iowa Supreme Court justices because of the high court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Group Says Extremists Funding Attack On Iowa Courts" posted at KCCI TV8 Des Moines, IA 10/13/10
The [liberal] Interfaith Alliance said it's not trying to tell Iowans how to vote, but said voters should know the group behind the effort is the American Family Association. The Alliance calls them an out-of-state extremist group with a hate-filled agenda.
The group met on the same steps where Bob Vander Plaats launched the effort months ago to remove three justices from their seats. Vander Plaats calls on supporters to vote against Chief Justice Marsha Ternus, David Baker and Michael Streit, all up for retention vote on Nov 2.
The AFA paid for an advertising campaign and according to public records, has covered nearly $70,000 in expenses for Vander Plaats' group, Iowa for Freedom.
David Lane, a spokesman for AFA Action Inc., said the group has every right to get involved in a campaign in Iowa.
About $320,000 has been spent on the campaign to oust the judges. The National Organization for Marriage has spent $235,000 on TV ads.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Iowa pastor preaches politics to oust 3 justices who backed gay marriage" posted at USA Today 10/13/10
The Rev. Cary K. Gordon . . . an associate pastor at Cornerstone World Outreach in Sioux City, says he will defy federal law this month when he urges the congregation to vote to not retain the three justices, who participated in a unanimous ruling that allowed same-sex couples to wed. His mass mailing to 1,000 church leaders in September prompted one national religious liberty group to file a complaint with the Internal Revenue Service.
Advocates of the separation of church and state and some religious leaders say Gordon's plan is illegal, immoral and an attempt to falsely frame his dispute as a freedom-of-speech violation. The Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State in Washington, D.C., called Gordon's actions one of the most outrageous attempts to politicize a church that he has ever seen.
Others, such as Jeff Mullen, senior pastor of Point of Grace Church in Waukee, are urging Iowa pastors to communicate to their congregations the "biblical mandate for involvement in local and national elections."
An IRS spokesman declined to comment.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
County Forbids Biblical Signage, Not Political
A South Carolina man says his constitutional rights have been violated after he was told by his local government to remove the Bible-themed signs he had posted on his property.
-- From "South Carolina Man Fights to Keep Religious Signs on His Property" By Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/8/10
Oscar Moultrie says a Berkeley County, S.C., ordinance that requires residents to obtain government permission before putting up signs on their private property -- other than "for sale," "for rent," political signs, and a few other exceptions -- violates his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
Moultrie says he received no complaints about his signs before the county ordered him in March to remove them or pay $25 to get a permit to post them.
In his lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston, S.C., he is asking the court to issue an immediate injunction that bars enforcement of the ordinance and declares it unconstitutional.
"The thing with the ordinance," says John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, which is representing Moultrie, "is it allows for political signs, which means that in this particular case it would be what you call viewpoint discrimination, which the Supreme Court and a number of federal courts have ruled on.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
-- From "South Carolina Man Fights to Keep Religious Signs on His Property" By Diane Macedo, FoxNews.com 10/8/10
Oscar Moultrie says a Berkeley County, S.C., ordinance that requires residents to obtain government permission before putting up signs on their private property -- other than "for sale," "for rent," political signs, and a few other exceptions -- violates his First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of religion.
Moultrie says he received no complaints about his signs before the county ordered him in March to remove them or pay $25 to get a permit to post them.
In his lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court in Charleston, S.C., he is asking the court to issue an immediate injunction that bars enforcement of the ordinance and declares it unconstitutional.
"The thing with the ordinance," says John Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute, which is representing Moultrie, "is it allows for political signs, which means that in this particular case it would be what you call viewpoint discrimination, which the Supreme Court and a number of federal courts have ruled on.
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
IL Gov. Pushes for Same-sex 'Marriage'
Drawing contrast with his GOP rival, gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady, Illinois Governor Pat Quinn predicts that he'll sign homosexual civil unions legislation in the coming weeks, and says he won't stand in the way of "gay marriage."
Illinois residents, click here to E-mail Gov. Quinn and legislators to stop the Gay Agenda.
UPDATE 11/30/10: Homosexual bills on the floor today!
UPDATE 11/10/10: Chicago Sun-Times reports enough votes to pass bill impending
-- From "Quinn: Ill. could legalize civil unions this year" by The Associated Press, posted at Chicago Tribune 10/6/10
Gov. Pat Quinn says he believes civil unions could be legalized in Illinois before the end of the year.
During an interview with the (Arlington Heights) Daily Herald, Quinn said he believes the measure has enough votes to pass during the legislature's fall veto session.
Quinn calls himself a strong advocate of civil unions and says it comes down to a "need to encourage tolerance" in Illinois.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois Governor Pat Quinn: Civil Unions Could Happen This Year" posted at Huffington Post 10/7/10
"The votes are there, I believe," Quinn said. "In the Senate for sure, and definitely I think we can do it in the House."
The measure legalizing civil unions was sponsored this year by Rep. Greg Harris, a Democratic state legislator from Chicago.
Every year, Harris sponsors two bills in the House: one legalizing civil unions, and the other for gay marriage. While he is a proponent of marriage rights, he's also a pragmatic vote-counter; Harris believes that more legislators will support the civil unions bill, though he's not certain that he has the 60 votes required for passage.
Still, there may be some urgency to the matter. Quinn's rival for governor, Republican State Senator Bill Brady, is staunchly opposed to any form of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Earlier this year, he introduced a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and civil unions.
If Quinn were to lose in November, the December veto session might be the last shot for some time at advancing gay rights in the state.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Illinois residents, click here to E-mail Gov. Quinn and legislators to stop the Gay Agenda.
UPDATE 11/30/10: Homosexual bills on the floor today!
UPDATE 11/10/10: Chicago Sun-Times reports enough votes to pass bill impending
-- From "Quinn: Ill. could legalize civil unions this year" by The Associated Press, posted at Chicago Tribune 10/6/10
Gov. Pat Quinn says he believes civil unions could be legalized in Illinois before the end of the year.
During an interview with the (Arlington Heights) Daily Herald, Quinn said he believes the measure has enough votes to pass during the legislature's fall veto session.
Quinn calls himself a strong advocate of civil unions and says it comes down to a "need to encourage tolerance" in Illinois.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Illinois Governor Pat Quinn: Civil Unions Could Happen This Year" posted at Huffington Post 10/7/10
"The votes are there, I believe," Quinn said. "In the Senate for sure, and definitely I think we can do it in the House."
The measure legalizing civil unions was sponsored this year by Rep. Greg Harris, a Democratic state legislator from Chicago.
Every year, Harris sponsors two bills in the House: one legalizing civil unions, and the other for gay marriage. While he is a proponent of marriage rights, he's also a pragmatic vote-counter; Harris believes that more legislators will support the civil unions bill, though he's not certain that he has the 60 votes required for passage.
Still, there may be some urgency to the matter. Quinn's rival for governor, Republican State Senator Bill Brady, is staunchly opposed to any form of marriage rights for same-sex couples. Earlier this year, he introduced a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage and civil unions.
If Quinn were to lose in November, the December veto session might be the last shot for some time at advancing gay rights in the state.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Monday, October 11, 2010
God Saves 3,000 Babies: Prayer Vigil
The national 40 Days for Life prayer campaign reached a historic milestone today as it can now confirm 3,000 babies have been saved from abortions as a result of the prayer and abortion alternatives efforts of pro-life advocates at abortion centers across the nation.
"Three thousand -- to God be the glory for reaching this major milestone."
-- From "40 Days for Life Prayer Campaign Reaches 3,000 Babies Saved From Abortion" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/11/10
. . . a story from Carol, a pro-life advocate in Houston, where two unborn children were spared from abortion.
A group prayed while one volunteer, holding a sign reading "Pray to end abortion," waved at cars driving by. After a while, a van turned into the Planned Parenthood parking lot. They drove around slowly then headed towards the exit . . . As they reached the street, the van stopped and a woman rolled down the window.
"Because you were here," she said, "my daughter has chosen not to have an abortion. Thanks for being here and saving her baby."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Victim of abortion credits God for her survival" by Charlotte Graham, The Leader Call (Laurel, MS) 10/9/10
Gianna Jessen is passionate about life and wants the world to know it.
“I was born in an abortion clinic which is pretty rare,” Jessen joked. “It was April 6, 1977. My biological parents were 17. My birth mom was in her seven-and-a-half month of pregnancy when she went to the abortion clinic.”
Jessen explained that her mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. She added that this was legal in Southern California where she was born. Jessen miraculously survived being “burned alive” for approximately 18 hours in the saline solution while in her mother’s womb.
“I should be blind… dead,” explained Jessen. “My story is not my identity. My identity is Christ.”
Jessen explained that she survived because of God’s handiwork. She was born in the early morning hours when the abortion doctor was not around. Jessen said that when the nurse on duty discovered she was alive, she called for an ambulance and had Jessen transported to a local hospital.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
"Three thousand -- to God be the glory for reaching this major milestone."
-- From "40 Days for Life Prayer Campaign Reaches 3,000 Babies Saved From Abortion" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/11/10
. . . a story from Carol, a pro-life advocate in Houston, where two unborn children were spared from abortion.
A group prayed while one volunteer, holding a sign reading "Pray to end abortion," waved at cars driving by. After a while, a van turned into the Planned Parenthood parking lot. They drove around slowly then headed towards the exit . . . As they reached the street, the van stopped and a woman rolled down the window.
"Because you were here," she said, "my daughter has chosen not to have an abortion. Thanks for being here and saving her baby."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Victim of abortion credits God for her survival" by Charlotte Graham, The Leader Call (Laurel, MS) 10/9/10
Gianna Jessen is passionate about life and wants the world to know it.
“I was born in an abortion clinic which is pretty rare,” Jessen joked. “It was April 6, 1977. My biological parents were 17. My birth mom was in her seven-and-a-half month of pregnancy when she went to the abortion clinic.”
Jessen explained that her mother was 17 when she had a saline abortion in her third trimester. She added that this was legal in Southern California where she was born. Jessen miraculously survived being “burned alive” for approximately 18 hours in the saline solution while in her mother’s womb.
“I should be blind… dead,” explained Jessen. “My story is not my identity. My identity is Christ.”
Jessen explained that she survived because of God’s handiwork. She was born in the early morning hours when the abortion doctor was not around. Jessen said that when the nurse on duty discovered she was alive, she called for an ambulance and had Jessen transported to a local hospital.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Muslim Holiday Celebrated at Mass. Schools
Public schools in Cambridge, Massachusetts will be the first in the state to close every year in honor of Eid al-Fitr or Eid al-Adha (Festival of Sacrifice).
. . . the city’s Muslim population appears to be growing.
"As their kids come home and say, ‘Oh, look, we now have a holiday,’ the parents might begin to feel safer here."
UPDATE 11/7/11: Muslim holiday celebrated for second year in a row
-- From "Cambridge school district to observe Muslim holiday" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
Cambridge School Committee member Marc McGovern, who pushed for the policy, says people should avoid what he calls hysteria and the stereotype of Muslims as terrorists. He says Cambridge schools close for some Christian and Jewish holidays and Muslims should be treated the same.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "School system to get Muslim holiday" by Brock Parker, Boston Globe Correspondent 10/10/10
The school district’s decision, announced last month, was made as the national discussion about Islam continues, fueled by a Mosque proposal two blocks from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Florida preacher Terry Jones’s threat to burn a Koran. The discussion has also touched local schools, as Wellesley school officials drew criticism recently for a video that showed sixth-grade students kneeling during a prayer service at a Boston mosque during a field trip in May.
Cambridge School Superintendent Jeffrey Young said the district does not collect information about the religion of its students. But Young said that there is a significant Muslim population in the city, and that, at least anecdotally, the Muslim population in the schools appears to be growing.
A large Muslim population is one of the reasons why the school district in Dearborn, Mich., began closing schools for high Islamic holy days 10 years ago, said David Mustonen, communications coordinator for the school system.
In September, public schools in Burlington, Vt., also closed on Eid al-Fitr for the first time, said Dan Balon, director of the school district’s diversity and equity office.
Balon said there is an increasing Muslim population in the schools, and the district decided to close on the holiday rather than risk low attendance rates and force students to decide between school and staying home to celebrate the holiday.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Note: Muslims represent less than two percent of the U.S. population, and is growing.
. . . the city’s Muslim population appears to be growing.
"As their kids come home and say, ‘Oh, look, we now have a holiday,’ the parents might begin to feel safer here."
UPDATE 11/7/11: Muslim holiday celebrated for second year in a row
-- From "Cambridge school district to observe Muslim holiday" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
Cambridge School Committee member Marc McGovern, who pushed for the policy, says people should avoid what he calls hysteria and the stereotype of Muslims as terrorists. He says Cambridge schools close for some Christian and Jewish holidays and Muslims should be treated the same.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "School system to get Muslim holiday" by Brock Parker, Boston Globe Correspondent 10/10/10
The school district’s decision, announced last month, was made as the national discussion about Islam continues, fueled by a Mosque proposal two blocks from the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in New York and Florida preacher Terry Jones’s threat to burn a Koran. The discussion has also touched local schools, as Wellesley school officials drew criticism recently for a video that showed sixth-grade students kneeling during a prayer service at a Boston mosque during a field trip in May.
Cambridge School Superintendent Jeffrey Young said the district does not collect information about the religion of its students. But Young said that there is a significant Muslim population in the city, and that, at least anecdotally, the Muslim population in the schools appears to be growing.
A large Muslim population is one of the reasons why the school district in Dearborn, Mich., began closing schools for high Islamic holy days 10 years ago, said David Mustonen, communications coordinator for the school system.
In September, public schools in Burlington, Vt., also closed on Eid al-Fitr for the first time, said Dan Balon, director of the school district’s diversity and equity office.
Balon said there is an increasing Muslim population in the schools, and the district decided to close on the holiday rather than risk low attendance rates and force students to decide between school and staying home to celebrate the holiday.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Note: Muslims represent less than two percent of the U.S. population, and is growing.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Pro-family/Pro-life Candidates Likely Winners
While Culture War issues are downplayed this election year, abortionists and homosexualists are facing a sea change political landscape across America. Example: The pro-abortion/pro-homosexual Iowa Gov. Culver is trailing by double digits in all polls.
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Teavangelical Party' Emerges from 2010 Election Polling
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Life' Wins 2010 Election
UPDATE 10/18/10: Republicans Will Take House From Pro-Abortion Democrats in Election
RELATED 10/8/10: Iowa Gov. candidate Brandstad opposed abortion via 'telemedicine'
Refer to On-line Abortions by Planned Parenthood Going Nationwide
-- From "From abortion to stem cells, Chet Culver and Terry Branstad differ sharply" by Jason Clayworth, The Des Moines Register 10/10/10
Republican Terry Branstad wants to require any woman seeking an abortion in Iowa to first undergo an ultrasound and view its depiction of the fetus.
In addition to abortion, some of the biggest differences between Culver and Branstad include:
• Marriage rights for same-sex couples. Culver favors; Branstad opposes.
• Stem-cell research. Culver favors embryonic stem-cell research; Branstad wants to reinstate a ban on that type of research.
A Catholic, Branstad was particularly active in his previous four terms in working to limit abortion. His administration fought a years-long battle to block the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Quad Cities. (A federal court ruled against him.) He also signed laws requiring notification of parents before a minor child could have an abortion and banning certain late-term abortions.
Culver, a member of a Presbyterian church, signed a bill repealing the 2002 ban on creating embryonic stem cells through a method known as therapeutic cloning. He believes such research can lead to lifesaving medical breakthroughs and expand the bioscience industry in Iowa.
Disagreement over the best tactic to fight same-sex marriage was a defining difference in the Republican primary for governor. This fall, focus on this issue has shifted from the governor's race to a high-profile campaign to oust three justices who participated in the unanimous April 2009 ruling that allowed same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above (which is extensive and detailed), CLICK HERE.
From "Polls From Last Week Show Pro-Life Candidates Winning or in Close Races" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/10/10
. . . some political observers are saying the odds of pro-life advocates recapturing the House and Senate from abortion proponents is now 50-50.
In the Washington Senate race, pro-life Republican challenger Dino Rossi has edged slightly ahead of pro-abortion incumbent Democrat Patty Murray.
Next, Republican Nathan Deal now holds a nine-point lead over Democrat Roy Barnes in the race to be Georgia’s next governor.
In Texas, pro-life Republican Governor Rick Perry has now moved past 50% support against pro-abortion Democratic challenger Bill White in his bid for reelection in Texas.
Looking at the Florida Senate race, coming off a contentious televised debate, pro-life Republican Marco Rubio has now jumped to a two-to-one lead over pro-abortion independent candidate Charlie Crist. Democratic Congressman Kendrick Meek still runs third.
In the Nevada gubernatorial race, Republican Brian Sandoval still holds a 13-point lead over Democrat Rory Reid . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Emily's List leader spurs women to halt GOP" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
A Democratic women's [pro-abortion] group is warning voters that a Republican takeover of Congress would mean "a dangerous world."
Emily's List, which aims to elect women who support abortion rights, also launched a website, boehnersamerica.org, with its view of the Republican agenda.
The group also plans an online advertising campaign around Mr. Boehner, similar to their drive against Sarah Palin, the GOP's 2008 vice-presidential nominee.
Two conservative groups opposed to abortion and gay marriage are teaming up in an effort to get more Latinos to vote for Republican [U.S. Senate Calif. candidate] Carly Fiorina.
The ad says that [Calif.] Sen. Barbara Boxer supports "abortion and homosexual marriage" and "doesn't share our values."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
See also, 'Pro-life Feminist' Candidates Storm Congress
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Teavangelical Party' Emerges from 2010 Election Polling
UPDATE 11/3/10: 'Life' Wins 2010 Election
UPDATE 10/18/10: Republicans Will Take House From Pro-Abortion Democrats in Election
RELATED 10/8/10: Iowa Gov. candidate Brandstad opposed abortion via 'telemedicine'
Refer to On-line Abortions by Planned Parenthood Going Nationwide
-- From "From abortion to stem cells, Chet Culver and Terry Branstad differ sharply" by Jason Clayworth, The Des Moines Register 10/10/10
Republican Terry Branstad wants to require any woman seeking an abortion in Iowa to first undergo an ultrasound and view its depiction of the fetus.
In addition to abortion, some of the biggest differences between Culver and Branstad include:
• Marriage rights for same-sex couples. Culver favors; Branstad opposes.
• Stem-cell research. Culver favors embryonic stem-cell research; Branstad wants to reinstate a ban on that type of research.
A Catholic, Branstad was particularly active in his previous four terms in working to limit abortion. His administration fought a years-long battle to block the opening of a Planned Parenthood clinic in the Quad Cities. (A federal court ruled against him.) He also signed laws requiring notification of parents before a minor child could have an abortion and banning certain late-term abortions.
Culver, a member of a Presbyterian church, signed a bill repealing the 2002 ban on creating embryonic stem cells through a method known as therapeutic cloning. He believes such research can lead to lifesaving medical breakthroughs and expand the bioscience industry in Iowa.
Disagreement over the best tactic to fight same-sex marriage was a defining difference in the Republican primary for governor. This fall, focus on this issue has shifted from the governor's race to a high-profile campaign to oust three justices who participated in the unanimous April 2009 ruling that allowed same-sex marriage in Iowa.
To read the entire article above (which is extensive and detailed), CLICK HERE.
From "Polls From Last Week Show Pro-Life Candidates Winning or in Close Races" by Steven Ertelt, LifeNews.com Editor 10/10/10
. . . some political observers are saying the odds of pro-life advocates recapturing the House and Senate from abortion proponents is now 50-50.
In the Washington Senate race, pro-life Republican challenger Dino Rossi has edged slightly ahead of pro-abortion incumbent Democrat Patty Murray.
Next, Republican Nathan Deal now holds a nine-point lead over Democrat Roy Barnes in the race to be Georgia’s next governor.
In Texas, pro-life Republican Governor Rick Perry has now moved past 50% support against pro-abortion Democratic challenger Bill White in his bid for reelection in Texas.
Looking at the Florida Senate race, coming off a contentious televised debate, pro-life Republican Marco Rubio has now jumped to a two-to-one lead over pro-abortion independent candidate Charlie Crist. Democratic Congressman Kendrick Meek still runs third.
In the Nevada gubernatorial race, Republican Brian Sandoval still holds a 13-point lead over Democrat Rory Reid . . .
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Emily's List leader spurs women to halt GOP" by The Associated Press 10/10/10
A Democratic women's [pro-abortion] group is warning voters that a Republican takeover of Congress would mean "a dangerous world."
Emily's List, which aims to elect women who support abortion rights, also launched a website, boehnersamerica.org, with its view of the Republican agenda.
The group also plans an online advertising campaign around Mr. Boehner, similar to their drive against Sarah Palin, the GOP's 2008 vice-presidential nominee.
Two conservative groups opposed to abortion and gay marriage are teaming up in an effort to get more Latinos to vote for Republican [U.S. Senate Calif. candidate] Carly Fiorina.
The ad says that [Calif.] Sen. Barbara Boxer supports "abortion and homosexual marriage" and "doesn't share our values."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
See also, 'Pro-life Feminist' Candidates Storm Congress
MN Archbishop Riles Liberals with Doctrine
Secularists and homosexualists join with liberal 'catholics' in protest of Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt preaching the Truth beyond the Church walls; the archdiocese mailed hundreds of thousands of DVDs in support of marriage (one man and one woman) as designed by God.
-- From "Minn. DVD against same-sex marriage sparks protest" by The Associated Press 10/9/10
Deb Bittner says she's a lifelong Catholic. But she thinks Archbishop John Nienstedt's (NYN'-stedz) DVD sent a message of exclusion.
The 53-year-old Bittner says Catholicism is supposed to be about compassion. She says she organized the protest after a lesbian co-worker received the DVD and asked Bittner what she as a Catholic would do about it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Catholics get creative in response to archbishop's anti-gay-marriage message" by Molly Guthrey, Twin Cities Pioneer Press 10/10/10
The materials, sent to Catholic households throughout Minnesota, include an introductory letter from each local bishop and the DVD, which features Nienstedt reviewing the Catholic teaching on marriage and his concerns about potential legislation that would alter the institution.
"Reactions, as you might guess, are across the board," said Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. "Some are extremely supportive, and some are not extremely supportive."
CLICK HERE to read the lengthy article chronicling how some people are protesting the Archbishop's DVD.
From "Minnesota Archbishop denies gay activists Holy Communion" by Richard Sikorski, Orange County Roman Catholic Examiner 10/8/10
An estimated 25 gay activists wearing protest buttons and sashes were denied Communion by Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt during his first student Mass at St. John's Abbey. When the protesters extended their hands to receive Our Lord's Body and Blood, Archbishop Nienstedt extended his hand in blessing instead.
The Archdiocese wanted to make it clear that the Archbishop was not refusing Holy Communion to homosexuals, only refusing to allow the Holy Eucharist as venue for protest. Archdiocese spoke person Dennis McGrath has repeatedly told gay activist groups, "You cannot receive communion if you wear the rainbow sash, because it's a political statement, a sign of protest. Going to the communion rail is the most sacred part of our faith, the eucharist. We don't allow anybody to make political statements or any kind of protest."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
-- From "Minn. DVD against same-sex marriage sparks protest" by The Associated Press 10/9/10
Deb Bittner says she's a lifelong Catholic. But she thinks Archbishop John Nienstedt's (NYN'-stedz) DVD sent a message of exclusion.
The 53-year-old Bittner says Catholicism is supposed to be about compassion. She says she organized the protest after a lesbian co-worker received the DVD and asked Bittner what she as a Catholic would do about it.
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
From "Catholics get creative in response to archbishop's anti-gay-marriage message" by Molly Guthrey, Twin Cities Pioneer Press 10/10/10
The materials, sent to Catholic households throughout Minnesota, include an introductory letter from each local bishop and the DVD, which features Nienstedt reviewing the Catholic teaching on marriage and his concerns about potential legislation that would alter the institution.
"Reactions, as you might guess, are across the board," said Dennis McGrath, spokesman for the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis. "Some are extremely supportive, and some are not extremely supportive."
CLICK HERE to read the lengthy article chronicling how some people are protesting the Archbishop's DVD.
From "Minnesota Archbishop denies gay activists Holy Communion" by Richard Sikorski, Orange County Roman Catholic Examiner 10/8/10
An estimated 25 gay activists wearing protest buttons and sashes were denied Communion by Twin Cities Roman Catholic Archbishop John C. Nienstedt during his first student Mass at St. John's Abbey. When the protesters extended their hands to receive Our Lord's Body and Blood, Archbishop Nienstedt extended his hand in blessing instead.
The Archdiocese wanted to make it clear that the Archbishop was not refusing Holy Communion to homosexuals, only refusing to allow the Holy Eucharist as venue for protest. Archdiocese spoke person Dennis McGrath has repeatedly told gay activist groups, "You cannot receive communion if you wear the rainbow sash, because it's a political statement, a sign of protest. Going to the communion rail is the most sacred part of our faith, the eucharist. We don't allow anybody to make political statements or any kind of protest."
To read the entire article above, CLICK HERE.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
