Thursday, May 03, 2007

Think Smoking and Transfats are Bad? Then how about Teaching Against Deviant Sex Acts?

While significant public school class time hours are consumed teaching children the horrible dangers of smoking, drug abuse, driving too fast, etc., why not teach the dangers of aberrant sex acts in between the condom class and the homosexual-behavior-is-normal class?

WARNING: The information that follows is important. People must be aware of this to understand the nature of male homosexuality -- be warned, it is highly disgusting to most people. Please skip the overview the section (in blue) if you are afraid you will be offended.

An overview of male homosexual behavior:

Around 99% of homosexual males engage in oral sex; 91% engage in anal sex; 82% engage in "rimming", touching the anus of one's partner with one's tongue and inserting the tongue into the anus; 22% engage in "fisting", inserting one's fist into the rectum of the partner; 23% engage in "golden showers", urinating on each other; 4% engage in "scat", the eating of feces, and in "mud rolling", rolling on the floor where feces have been deposited.

Every time a homosexual advocate sees the above oft-repeated statistics, you'll hear him/her cry, "These sex acts aren't exclusive to homosexuals -- heterosexuals do this stuff too!"

OK, fine, for sake of argument, let's suppose that aberrant sex acts are equally common among heterosexuals. The question remains: Why don't the public school sexual revolutionaries, who insist on sexualizing children, teach the children the health hazards of any number of deviant sex acts?

There's no shortage of medical data to prove the health hazards. Check out this webpage or this one.

Since we observe that the public schools have no qualms about teaching kids sexual techniques for increasing pleasure with their partner, it's obvious that these teachers aren't too timid to broach the subject of the dangers of coprophilia (using feces for sexual excitement).

So why isn't this taught? The answer is obvious. If the general public became aware of the aberrant nature of homosexual behavior (which such school instruction would certainly cause), the homosexual agenda would be stopped dead in its tracks. Therefore, the homosexual advocates who write curriculum in public schools know better than to address the health risks of the deviancy of homosexual behavior.

"Now children, why is it we don't smoke cigarettes, or eat potato chips? That's right, these behaviors can harm our bodies."

Yah, right -- you keep 'em safe, teach!