U.S. District Judge Vaughn R. Walker, who ruled last week that a voter-approved amendment to California’s constitution that limited marriage to the union of one man and one woman violated the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, based that ruling in part on his finding that a child does not need and has no right to a mother. Nor, he found, does a child have a need or a right to a father.
UPDATE 4/26/11: Marriage Defenders File Motion Saying Walker Ruling Biased
UPDATE 4/8/11: Judge says being a homosexual did not prejudice him
UPDATE 9/30/10: Homosexual judge retires after accomplishing his Gay Agenda
UPDATE 10/1/10: Absent the activist judge -- possibly a game changer
-- From "Same-Sex Marriage Judge Finds That a Child Has Neither a Need Nor a Right to a Mother" by Terence P. Jeffrey, Editor-in-Chief CNSNews.com 8/9/10
“Children do not need to be raised by a male parent and a female parent to be well-adjusted, and having both a male and a female parent does not increase the likelihood that a child will be well-adjusted,” the judge wrote in finding of fact No. 71 in his opinion.
“The gender of a child’s parent is not a factor in a child’s adjustment,” the judge stated in finding of fact No. 70. “The sexual orientation of an individual does not determine whether that individual can be a good parent. Children raised by gay or lesbian parents are as likely as children raised by heterosexual parents to be healthy, successful and well-adjusted. The research supporting this conclusion is accepted beyond serious debate in the field of developmental psychology.”
Despite Walker’s claim that this “fact” is “beyond serious debate,” one of the sources he cited for it was a brochure published by the American Psychological Association (APA) that was entered into evidence in the case, which specifically stated twice: “Few studies are available regarding children of gay fathers.” Walker did not quote this part of the brochure in his opinion.
However, Walker did quote this same brochure as saying: “[S]ocial science has shown that the concerns often raised about children of lesbian and gay parents--concerns that are generally grounded in prejudice against and stereotypes about gay people--are unfounded.”
To read the entire article, CLICK HERE.
Monday, August 09, 2010
Homosexual Judge Says Children Don't Need Parents
Labels:
CA,
children,
gay agenda,
gay parenting,
homosexuality,
judicial activism,
parents